I think more likely is that they think the naked eye can't tell teh difference and by jus tsaying they're finetuning it, they're hoping that we will all think we see a clearer picture.Tom Bombadil said:Couldn't they be playing with other parameters than bitrate or resolution? Things like edge enhancement, image smoothing, color, etc.? Some of these could make small changes to the bitrates, not enough to distinguish themselves from typical program to program differences.
So could their present focus be upon fine-tuning the 1280 picture and not upon increasing resolution?
Or am I completely off base here?
PS to Purogamer, if that picture is of your significant other, then all hail to you.
RandallA said:"So could their present focus be upon fine-tuning the 1280 picture and not upon increasing resolution?"
That sounds like a good explanation of what they are doing.
SatinKzo said:Yeah, I agree.
I don't check the numbers like Gary or Hokie do, so maybe tonight they can post what they are seeing.
SatinKzo said:I responded to my feedback email and the message came back underliverable. Anyone else who was asked for feeback get their email through?
SatinKzo said:Bob, I won't ask more than this on your email for feedback as it is different then mine:
Was yours from a person or from the dishquality address? Mine was a second email relating to my initial email about my phone call to them and the VOOM PQ.
Gary Murrell said:No changes to anything Voom on either Sat occured last night, bitrates nor resolution never changed on anything(not even for a short while)
-Gary
RandallA said:Are you kidding?
RandallA said:Maybe someone needs to wake Gary up and maybe he can do his magic and let us know. He was up late last night looking for any changes.
JH1949 said:12/6/2005 @ 7AM CST Voom still looked the same as last night: not sharp on my 30" LCD
12/6/2005 @ 11:50 AM CST turned Voom back on and it looked great!
Did E* go back to previous higher definition transmission.