Saw Dan win the Indy in 2005. It was my first trip to the 500. Sad. My condolences to his family and may he rest in peace.
Indy Car driver Dan Weldon dies after crash
- Thread starter JAG72
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 24
- Views 3K
Diamond Jim said:
I'm not sure why, and I know the Indy cars are safe, but why is it they are designed to fall apart in a crash, had this been a Stock car ala Nascar, he may stilll be here.
Sent from my Samsung Epic using SatelliteGuys
It will be interesting to see what they do . After Earnhardt was killed they overreacted, in my opinion. You will never ever get rid of the risk of racing when you race at those speeds. Indy Cars are more dangerous because of the weight and the chance that they become airborne.
Jimbo, I'm not an engineer but my understanding is the car seems to disintegrate in order to dissipate the energy of the impact through the entire vehicle instead of concentrating the impact.
In the early years of NASCAR and Indy cars it was assumed that a solid or rigid car was safer, Later, it was found that if the car dissipated the energy of the impact the effect on the driver was much less.
In Indy cars the tub the driver is cocooned in is the only "rigid" portion of the car. Same as the cage in NASCAR.
The way Wheldon's car impacted the catch fence (flush with the top of the cockpit) there was very little chance the outcome was going to be good.
My own opinion, the Indy cars need to stay off the tracks with progressive banking. It's basis of design was to provide more racing grooves for stock cars.
After this and the Texas debacle, I hope Indy car takes a hard look at the type of ovals they are racing on. If they are to race ovals and I like really Indy oval racing, "flat" tracks like Indy, Pocono, New Hampshire and Milwaukee should be where they go. Not Texas, Homestead, LVMS,etc.
In the early years of NASCAR and Indy cars it was assumed that a solid or rigid car was safer, Later, it was found that if the car dissipated the energy of the impact the effect on the driver was much less.
In Indy cars the tub the driver is cocooned in is the only "rigid" portion of the car. Same as the cage in NASCAR.
The way Wheldon's car impacted the catch fence (flush with the top of the cockpit) there was very little chance the outcome was going to be good.
My own opinion, the Indy cars need to stay off the tracks with progressive banking. It's basis of design was to provide more racing grooves for stock cars.
After this and the Texas debacle, I hope Indy car takes a hard look at the type of ovals they are racing on. If they are to race ovals and I like really Indy oval racing, "flat" tracks like Indy, Pocono, New Hampshire and Milwaukee should be where they go. Not Texas, Homestead, LVMS,etc.
Similar threads
