Here is my RAIDERS WINNING SCHEDULED
- Thread starter Hugo M Garcia
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 321
- Views 25K
If the Raiders had trashy players like ben people would be talking about that even more.
If the Raiders had trashy players like ben people would be talking about that even more.
Raiders are where people go to find a nursing home !!!
Washington on the EAST coast.
Or to find a payday... dude is good but I'm not sure how many teams would have given the 31 y/o Richard Seymour a 1 year $12m deal, especially teams that would feel lucky to be .500.
It's like they're paying a chunk of that money they'd have paid to a first round pick anyways, without the potential of that money paying dividends for the next decade via production on the field.
It's like they're paying a chunk of that money they'd have paid to a first round pick anyways, without the potential of that money paying dividends for the next decade via production on the field.
Last edited:
The Raiders are making improvement on the field, Denver has taken a step back by losing Marshall.
I can seriously see 8-8 or 9-7.
I can seriously see 8-8 or 9-7.
:up
Don't you have to win MORE than you lose to have a WINNING SEASON ?
Title of the thread caught me by surprise ....
Do Raider fans feel under 9 wins is a winning season ?
Just wondering ...
Title of the thread caught me by surprise ....
Do Raider fans feel under 9 wins is a winning season ?
Just wondering ...
It does say WINNING SCHEDULE[strike] D [/strike]. Since everyone's record starts out 0-0, even Raider fans have the right to be optimistic about their season in June.
It does say WINNING SCHEDULE[strike] D [/strike]. Since everyone's record starts out 0-0, even Raider fans have the right to be optimistic about their season in June.
Well, they open with Tennessee, will they have a winning record at any time this year ?
0-1 @ Titans - This is probably a win if Chris Johnson holds out
1-1 Rams
2-1 @ Cardinals - assuming they have some problems, and really miss Warner
2-2 Texans
3-2 Chargers - Probably will be a loss, but gave all home division games a W, a lot still TBD w/ the Chargers due to holdouts, loss of veterans.
3-3 @ 49ers
3-4 @ Broncos
4-4 Seahawks - Could be a loss, really not sure what we'll see from Seattle this year, but Raiders hosting
5-4 Chiefs
- BYE -
5-5 @ Steelers
5-6 Dolphins - Could probably go either way.
5-7 @ Chargers
6-7 @ Jaguars - Bad team, but could be a loss due to travel
7-7 Broncos
7-8 Colts
7-9 @ Chiefs
Could see a winning season and a lot of reason to hope early in the season, but their late schedule is not nice. Split the division, rather than trying to predict it, those games are usually good no matter what teams are on the decline/improving, that's an automatic 3-3.
Could see 4-12, could see 9-7. Likely something in-between, so I'd guess 6-10
1-1 Rams
2-1 @ Cardinals - assuming they have some problems, and really miss Warner
2-2 Texans
3-2 Chargers - Probably will be a loss, but gave all home division games a W, a lot still TBD w/ the Chargers due to holdouts, loss of veterans.
3-3 @ 49ers
3-4 @ Broncos
4-4 Seahawks - Could be a loss, really not sure what we'll see from Seattle this year, but Raiders hosting
5-4 Chiefs
- BYE -
5-5 @ Steelers
5-6 Dolphins - Could probably go either way.
5-7 @ Chargers
6-7 @ Jaguars - Bad team, but could be a loss due to travel
7-7 Broncos
7-8 Colts
7-9 @ Chiefs
Could see a winning season and a lot of reason to hope early in the season, but their late schedule is not nice. Split the division, rather than trying to predict it, those games are usually good no matter what teams are on the decline/improving, that's an automatic 3-3.
Could see 4-12, could see 9-7. Likely something in-between, so I'd guess 6-10
4-12 in 2010. They will be able to continue to build with another top 5-7 pic.........................Oh, wait, nevermind
::haha
::haha
Yeah, Jason Campbell probably going to cause the Pats first rounder from the Raiders next draft to drop a couple spots, shucks. Now when you trade down it'll only be wirth 2 2nds and a 4th instead of a 3rd
WIth what they're paying Seymour, it's like they're paying out that first round salary absent the return on investment in a player that will be around for a decade.
WIth what they're paying Seymour, it's like they're paying out that first round salary absent the return on investment in a player that will be around for a decade.
CFL has too much class to sign him. I would not be surprised if the UFL & Arena Football League also passed up on him.
Last edited:
AGREED!:uphe is a FORMER Raider and a FORMER mistake....please do not out him here...
