I have to add that the "K" boxes (722K and 222K) produce a noticeable clearer picture. When I switch to my 722, the fuzziness is apparent. The PQ coming out of a 722 (and presumably the 622 and 612) is inferior. The 222K also kicks-but compared to the 722. The 722K is connected to the same TV as a 722. In the other room the 222K is connected to the same TV as another 722. Others have posted saying that they too have seen the difference in PQ. I would love it if someone could perform the DirecTV / Dish Network HD visual comparison using a 722K or 222K, then report their observations. Yes, there really is that much difference in the "K's."
Now, if you watch nothing but the 722, you really don't see a problem. But the difference is clear once you see the more clear, present, pop, brightness and sharpness coming out of the 722K and 222K. Even the contrast of light and dark seems better. Switching to the 722 makes me feel like I need glasses. After a while I get used to the fuzziness. I have to add than when my aunt and uncle went exchanged their two 722's for two 722K's, they remarked, without my ever having mentioned it, that they noticed the "K's" seemed to them to provide a better picture than the 722's. they had. They really noticed the text being much more clear and easier to read for it CLARITY, not font. INTERESTING. And they aint no techies.
Bit rate is going to have a far greater impact on the quality of the HD picture than the 1440x1920 issue. I really do LOVE the HD PQ coming out of my "K's." Just don't over compress things, Charles.
Now, if you watch nothing but the 722, you really don't see a problem. But the difference is clear once you see the more clear, present, pop, brightness and sharpness coming out of the 722K and 222K. Even the contrast of light and dark seems better. Switching to the 722 makes me feel like I need glasses. After a while I get used to the fuzziness. I have to add than when my aunt and uncle went exchanged their two 722's for two 722K's, they remarked, without my ever having mentioned it, that they noticed the "K's" seemed to them to provide a better picture than the 722's. they had. They really noticed the text being much more clear and easier to read for it CLARITY, not font. INTERESTING. And they aint no techies.
Bit rate is going to have a far greater impact on the quality of the HD picture than the 1440x1920 issue. I really do LOVE the HD PQ coming out of my "K's." Just don't over compress things, Charles.