HBO/Cinemax Takedown

I have an idea if Dish wants to play hardball. It's probably unworkable. Give Showtime, at no additional cost, to everybody who had HBO for the duration of the dispute. It would probably cost Charlie too much, but what a way to up the ante.
 
I've always had mixed feelings about Dish disputes. They're frustrating, distracting, and inconvenient. But I'm 100% on the side of Dish on this one. No provider should have to guarantee subscribers. This is ATT socializing a TV channel so that they can pay for freebies they give their own customers.
 
I have an idea if Dish wants to play hardball. It's probably unworkable. Give Showtime, at no additional cost, to everybody who had HBO for the duration of the dispute. It would probably cost Charlie too much, but what a way to up the ante.

Dish doesn't own Showtime. If they did, they could play the same game ATT is playing with HBO.

Maybe its time for Dish to purchase some premium channels.... :D
 
I know Dish doesn't own Showtime. That's why I said it would probably cost too much, they would have to reimburse Showtime. However, Showtime might get some new long term subs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheKrell
I've always had mixed feelings about Dish disputes. They're frustrating, distracting, and inconvenient. But I'm 100% on the side of Dish on this one. No provider should have to guarantee subscribers. This is ATT socializing a TV channel so that they can pay for freebies they give their own customers.
Since we’re all guessing exactly what’s being negotiated maybe it’s AT&T offering pricing based on the number of subscribers, voiukn pricing? If Dish guarantees x number of subs we will charge you A per sub. You guarantee Y number of suns we will charge you B per sub. But i’m sure it’s totally AT&T’s fault, Dish would never say anything that would make it look like they are partly to blame.
 
Agree, but I think you should then point your anger to much bigger targets, drug companies are one that pops up to the top of my list.

In a TV - Satellite forum about DISH not having HBO and At&t now owning HBO ..and the first time ever HBO has been pulled? A drug company discussion would seem out of place, no?
 
I can't believe that AT&T is being this stupid with the appeal of the merger still in the courts. If they were smarter they wouldn't have stirred up this hornet's nest until the appeal had been decided. Apparently they are so greedy they couldn't wait so maybe that greed will be their undoing. We can only hope...
 
i am guessing its charlies way of trying to stop the merger

but hey thats just my opinion
I'm of the same opinion.

AT&T should've had to sell the vertical parts of the proposed merger. By vertical I mean by them being a content distributor, they should not own/buy content providers. They are perfectly free to create their own content (didn't they do Mr. Mercedes?) but should not be able to own the oldest (45 years) premium channel. They need to dump 'em.
 
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Dish doesn't own Showtime. If they did, they could play the same game ATT is playing with HBO.

Maybe its time for Dish to purchase some premium channels.... :D

That's what this dispute really is about. Dish got left behind while DirecTV / Comast and others were out buying content. It started with Comcast and NBC, then ATT purchased DirecTV and Comcast parterned with Verizon, and then ATT bought HBO to level the playing field. Charlie went the direction of buying spectrum with no content plan. Now Dish is playing catchup and cant. Discovery / Tmobile would be a potential targets for Dish.


Except for all the rural folks who don't have adequate internet access for streaming who then must sign up for AT&T's DirecTV.

I can't believe you don't see the problem with that unless you're an AT&T share holder who doesn't care who gets screwed as long as you make a buck.

The number of people that its is negotiable when you look at the subscriber base.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trojan67
That's what this dispute really is about. Dish got left behind while DirecTV / Comast and others were out buying content.

Exactly this. Dish has no content leverage. If they owned some slate of channels, they could play hardball with AT&T. But instead the have spectrum licenses they've failed to do anything with and are at risk of losing.

HBO is the start. Wait for when Turner channels or AT&T SportsNet contracts need to be renewed. Comcast can leverage the NBC slate against AT&T. Dish has nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: josem3
I'm of the same opinion.

AT&T should've had to sell the vertical parts of the proposed merger. By vertical I mean by them being a content distributor, they should not own/buy content providers. They are perfectly free to create their own content (didn't they do Mr. Mercedes?) but should not be able to own the oldest (45 years) premium channel. They need to dump 'em.
But the government has already set the precedent by allowing Comcast to buy NBC Universal, they let Disney buy ABC. The goring further Shell is not allowed to own any crude oil production or refineries if they have stations to see the product?

The 'brains' have said that content is king and the MSO's needed to secure content, which is what they are doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goaliebob99
Exactly this. Dish has no content leverage. If they owned some slate of channels, they could play hardball with AT&T. But instead the have spectrum licenses they've failed to do anything with and are at risk of losing.

HBO is the start. Wait for when Turner channels or AT&T SportsNet contracts need to be renewed. Comcast can leverage the NBC slate against AT&T. Dish has nothing.
Give that man a cigar. Charlie spent billions on buying up spectrum licenses, which have cost him billions and maybe he'll make a network some day or just cash out and retire. Others figured out if you want people you buy or service we better have something compelling on it to watch so they bought content.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 2)

Top