Harmonic encoder
I have refrained from posting for numerous reasons mostly being the depth of responses viewed.As I understand a moving video image is best viewed in its raw state. That most likely is an AVI. That is a large file. To show that in realtime requires bandwidth. In order to conserve the amount of memory used, the industry started using MPEG encoding. As the MPEG# increases, the file size decreases. (kind of like zipping a zip file) Another example is a JPEG, not a bad picture, just keep re saving it and the picture quality decreases. An MPEG4 file or encryption does not have the quality of an MPEG2. So a question comes to my mind, how can the quality of an MPEG4 encrypted video have the same quality of MPEG2? They must be a reason Hollywood is not using MPEG4. It may be ok for low resolution.
I have refrained from posting for numerous reasons mostly being the depth of responses viewed.As I understand a moving video image is best viewed in its raw state. That most likely is an AVI. That is a large file. To show that in realtime requires bandwidth. In order to conserve the amount of memory used, the industry started using MPEG encoding. As the MPEG# increases, the file size decreases. (kind of like zipping a zip file) Another example is a JPEG, not a bad picture, just keep re saving it and the picture quality decreases. An MPEG4 file or encryption does not have the quality of an MPEG2. So a question comes to my mind, how can the quality of an MPEG4 encrypted video have the same quality of MPEG2? They must be a reason Hollywood is not using MPEG4. It may be ok for low resolution.