It will almost certainly be a unix file system, and if they're smart it will be one with logging.
Cheers,
Using Windows 2003 as your raid controller will work, just not very well and you stand substantial risk if it crashes. Better to get a good hardware raid controller like an Adaptec.
You mean with journaling.
I don't know about this reformatting bit. In the interview the guy said you could actually more the recordings over to a computer, but the computer wouldn't be able to play them back. Did he mean Unix computers only?
We have no choice in this matter The rest of the servers in the station use Windows 2003 server. It is sent to us to replace the server that crashed and it has to be the same set up as the previous archive server set up. As i have said I don't set up the units, I'm the maintenance engineer at the station. I'm not the IT engineer. it is his job to set the unit up and it has been a "B" for him to do it to replace the unit that crashed. He also set up the Archive servers well before I started working at the TV station.
Don't mean to get on the pulpit, but IMHO it's better to get an internal and a GOOD enclosure. The brand name externals housings are less than desireable.I saw the Seagate free agent 750G drive for just under 200 at costco this week.
Don't mean to get on the pulpit, but IMHO it's better to get an internal and a GOOD enclosure. The brand name externals housings are less than desireable.
Well, we're talking two different things. Those test results show glitches per minute. In fact, 40% of the brand name external enclosures/HDs did not pass. My argument is about heat build-up and distribution, and the longevity of the drive. This is where ala-carte enclosures are preferable.The tests that someone linked to (with cable DVRs), showed exactly the opposite.
All the brand name external USB HDs had no problems, but some of the enclosure and HD combinations did.
OK- how about specifying one or more really good enclosures and some specific models of 500 and 750 GB HDs?