Galaxy 11 interference

[magnigyro]

Yesterday I get signal from Galaxy 11 @ 91W, I use (as always) a lnb linear universal). Quality 70% in strong transponder marked on "the list!".

I got a deport feed very good....besides a bunch of blank channels...from his orbit partner in 91W ...that canadian bird$...

how can I avoid that?

 

[Mr Tony]

If the receiver has a way to only scan from 11700-12200 by al means change it.

A universal scans from 10700-12750 which si the whole KU band. Since 91 has 3 satellites there (Galaxy 11 & Nimiq1 & Nimiq3) when you scan the whole KU Band tyou'll get some transponders like that at low signal

same when you scan 83...you'll get interference from 82. Its not really interference. Its actually picking up those channels

Thats why I use standards. Universals are only really needed when dealing with sats across the Atlantic

 

[SatPhreak]

The other day I was scaning 83 and I ended up picking up about 10 of 15 channels from 82. I thought this was really strange because my dish only has a standard linear lnb on it and I had set my Visionsat to scan from 11700 to 12200.
I just deleted those channels but I still wonder why they even were logged since they all are higher than my lnb should pick up. All was fine when I scaned G11 though.

 

[Mr Tony]

weird. I know on the Pansats they scan up to 12350 so I usually grab a couple transponders from the DBS satellites

 

[Tron]

I've had this problem even on the Invacom Quad. One way to prevent this would be if you could eliminate all transponders with a symbol rate of 20,000. I know you can scan for a particular symbol rate (network scan), but I don't know how you could tell the receiver to AVOID a particular symbol rate.

 

[qwert1515]

Getting rid of the 20000 symbol rate would not be a good idea because there have been some feeds that have used that symbol rate. I like the Coolsat because I can set the scan range to 11700 - 12200 the only problem is that I have to do that for each satellite I scan, I guess I should switch my universal LNB to a standard one.

 

[Mr Tony]

Getting rid of the 20000 symbol rate would not be a good idea because there have been some feeds that have used that symbol rate. I like the Coolsat because I can set the scan range to 11700 - 12200 the only problem is that I have to do that for each satellite I scan, I guess I should switch my universal LNB to a standard one.

if you set the LNB to 10600 and turn 22k on then the parameters for blind scan are off by 150mhz then (it would default 11550-12050) so a standard is the best

 

[updatelee]

as iceburg pointed out though, limiting the scan to below 12200 is best anyhow as in NA there is no need to scan anything above that. this will eliminate the DTH provider signals from being scanned in, but also speed up your scan.

 

[babcea]

My sv8k will blind scan channels from nimiq 91 ,when I am scanning on c-band 91,it lists them as nascr and puts them in the radio side,and they have music on them but they are from the c band sat.BTW has anyone blind scan c band 91 lately,those with hd should.