Yes and No. In most Crime shows like Law & Order, Killer Instinct, or any other there is always the mystery factor of the investigative work or the discovery or deposition phase of the case. In this instance, 'Close to Home' fails to deliver the mystery and jumps that phase and immediately you, the audience, will know the punch line of the story and how it will end. There's very little investigative work and very little imagination in the show and the main prosecutor fails to make a convincing story. There are certain characters in all crime shows that have a hack for the 'know' it all and basically give away the story. In other crime shows, one finds these characters in the background and not as lead characters. When the lead character is one of these, leaves the story without any mystery or suspense of what's going to happen. Of course, this is my opinion after watching 4 episodes. I gave up after that. In fact, the 15 min of the actual crime is more interested than how the main character(s) resolve or prosecute.