it isn't the number of sports channels, its the high cost of ESPN. No one cares about 23 cents for Fox Sports 1 and 10 cents for Fox Sports 2.
Looks like Fox Sports is more interesting than ESPN, higher energy hosts, etc.
Obviously this content costs Fox $$$ but they will make it up on the advertising, eventually. Dish will have to put Fox Sports 2 in HD to be competitive with DirecTV.
Looks like Fox Sports is more interesting than ESPN, higher energy hosts, etc.
Obviously this content costs Fox $$$ but they will make it up on the advertising, eventually. Dish will have to put Fox Sports 2 in HD to be competitive with DirecTV.