my fear of "dish squishing" appear unfounded.
I decided instead of threaded rods for now, I'd drill a couple more adjustment holes in each arm, with a sliver of metal between them so that they wouldn't turn into adjustment slots.
I started with the factory holes and had 11.4 db s/n on my peaking signal at mid-arc (AMC-15). Going to the next adjustment hole on each side, I got to 12.2 db s/n and when I did my zero position dish push test (push slightly on the lnb holder arm channel metal), I only got .2 db more signal, not .5 to 1 db more signal like when using the factory holes, so I"m as close as I can get with the second adjustment hole unless I did threaded rods to squeeze out that last .2 db s/n.
I went to the third hole and got to 10.9, so I know that's worse than the factory hole or my second hole. I"m going to keep my holder at the second adjustment hole (12.2 db) and not worry about threaded rods since I'm only going to gain about .2 db more signal maximum.
So I've fixed the invacom weight issue to satisfaction - .8 db s/n more signal, not much more significant room for improvement - and it's back to getting the arc tracked right. I'm falling off about SM5 on the west and about G26 on the east, so I have to figure out what moves to make (rotate dish/hh120 about the mounting pole or rotate the dish on the hh120 post - or both) that will get the arc dialed in. I never had this much problem with the 90cm. The 120cm is giving me fits -- probably because it's bigger and more sloppier than the 90cm so its more delicate to tune to the arc right -- but I'll get it dialed in at some point. I"m think I"m about to pretend like I'm doing a c-band alignment and use extreme sat/south sat procedures. I know where south sat is (zero position) but I have to reason out a way to determine how much hh120 movement to the east would correspond to the extreme sat (AMC-5) position since I'm too far off the arc at AMC-5 right now to even see a small hint of AMC-5 signal on a spectrum analzyer or signal meter.
I decided instead of threaded rods for now, I'd drill a couple more adjustment holes in each arm, with a sliver of metal between them so that they wouldn't turn into adjustment slots.
I started with the factory holes and had 11.4 db s/n on my peaking signal at mid-arc (AMC-15). Going to the next adjustment hole on each side, I got to 12.2 db s/n and when I did my zero position dish push test (push slightly on the lnb holder arm channel metal), I only got .2 db more signal, not .5 to 1 db more signal like when using the factory holes, so I"m as close as I can get with the second adjustment hole unless I did threaded rods to squeeze out that last .2 db s/n.
I went to the third hole and got to 10.9, so I know that's worse than the factory hole or my second hole. I"m going to keep my holder at the second adjustment hole (12.2 db) and not worry about threaded rods since I'm only going to gain about .2 db more signal maximum.
So I've fixed the invacom weight issue to satisfaction - .8 db s/n more signal, not much more significant room for improvement - and it's back to getting the arc tracked right. I'm falling off about SM5 on the west and about G26 on the east, so I have to figure out what moves to make (rotate dish/hh120 about the mounting pole or rotate the dish on the hh120 post - or both) that will get the arc dialed in. I never had this much problem with the 90cm. The 120cm is giving me fits -- probably because it's bigger and more sloppier than the 90cm so its more delicate to tune to the arc right -- but I'll get it dialed in at some point. I"m think I"m about to pretend like I'm doing a c-band alignment and use extreme sat/south sat procedures. I know where south sat is (zero position) but I have to reason out a way to determine how much hh120 movement to the east would correspond to the extreme sat (AMC-5) position since I'm too far off the arc at AMC-5 right now to even see a small hint of AMC-5 signal on a spectrum analzyer or signal meter.