Could be.There has ALWAY been speculation about Armstrong. I am wondering, to play the devils advocate, if he COULD BE....I repeat, COULD BE....getting a break because of ALL of things he does for cancer research and 'considered' a nice guy...?
Could be.There has ALWAY been speculation about Armstrong. I am wondering, to play the devils advocate, if he COULD BE....I repeat, COULD BE....getting a break because of ALL of things he does for cancer research and 'considered' a nice guy...?
Could be.
LOL! I think there is has to be fire there because there has been ALOT of smoke there. He has been rumored by EVERYONE and, they even wrote a book about the speculation that he has been on steroids.
Who wrote it, Landis.
The new book he'll have coming out, will it talk about how he was wrong, or will it be a campaign against Armstrong ?
IF I am not mistaken, there was one written by the French a few years back.
Look, I am not saying he DID or didn't ...BUT everywhere there has been ALOT of smoke, there was a fire...when it came to WHO was or was not using PEDs. And I am just asking a simple question:
IS he or is he NOT getting a break from these allegations because of his work for cancer and he battle with cancer? I mean it's easy to be all against Landis because he is known to be an dirt stain, similar to Barry Bonds.....
IF I am not mistaken, there was one written by the French a few years back.
Look, I am not saying he DID or didn't ...BUT everywhere there has been ALOT of smoke, there was a fire...when it came to WHO was or was not using PEDs. And I am just asking a simple question:
IS he or is he NOT getting a break from these allegations because of his work for cancer and he battle with cancer? I mean it's easy to be all against Landis because he is known to be an dirt stain, similar to Barry Bonds.....
Possibly, except that all the European are so pissed that he keeps winning on their turf, and thus had their labs running every know test possible on his samples.There has ALWAY been speculation about Armstrong. I am wondering, to play the devils advocate, if he COULD BE....I repeat, COULD BE....getting a break because of ALL of things he does for cancer research and 'considered' a nice guy...?
Look, I am not saying he DID or didn't ...BUT everywhere there has been ALOT of smoke, there was a fire...when it came to WHO was or was not using PEDs. And I am just asking a simple question:
I am not saying Lance did or he didn't either. Smoke and fire...I don't know if that's fair or not. You have to consider where the smoke is coming from.
The French obviously have a vendetta against Armstrong, and the media over there is constantly falling all over themselves to slander him, and try to prove that he cheated. So far, despite all of their efforts, they have been unsuccessful.
As an outsider there are two ways to look at this. How on earth can a guy who was on his deathbed come back a few years later and achieve what he did...what no man has ever been able to accomplish in the rich history of cycling? Almost makes you think he had to have had help.
On the other hand, this is a guy who almost died from cancer. As Lance has said, do you think he would possibly consider putting anything in his body that could potentially cause harm? He already almost died once, and his cancer is in remission...not gone. Difficult to imagine that too.
No clue which is correct, just be careful with the smoke/fire stuff. You're just making more smoke.
Sandra