FCC to regulate Internet service providers

whatchel1

SatelliteGuys Master
Original poster
Sep 30, 2006
9,098
51
Great High Plains
New hybrid control on I-net for the FCC. Here is the article for you to read. And before you go crazy I can't give a link to it. It takes a subscription to Broadcast Engineering to access it.

Seeking to re-establish the FCC’s legal authority after losing a court decision to Comcast, FCC chairman Julius Genachowski announced last week a plan that reclassifies broadband technology as a hybrid between an information service and a utility.

By doing this, the FCC will regain sufficient power to regulate Internet traffic under existing law. Genachowski’s plan is virtually assured victory, since he has the support of the Democratic majority on the FCC as well as the blessing of key members of Congress.

The chairman said he was not happy with the two conventional options posed after the FCC lost the Comcast case. One option was to pursue the National Broadband Plan the same as before and risk more negative court decisions down the road.

The other was to fully reclassify Internet communications as a telecommunications service. That would have resolved the FCC’s legal authority, but would have required more regulation than Genachowski felt was warranted. Thus, the FCC attorneys came up with what the chairman called “the third way.”

A third way recognizes the transmission component of broadband access service — and only this component — as a telecommunications service. It applies only a handful of provisions of Title II. Simultaneously, it renounces the application of many sections of the Communications Act that are unnecessary and inappropriate for broadband access service and guards against regulatory overreach.

Genachowski said this would offer a sound legal foundation for the FCC to proceed into the future and eliminate uncertainty about the legality of its decisions. It would also, he said, restore the status quo of the FCC’s approach before the Comcast decision. Meaningful boundaries and constraints would be established to prevent regulatory overreach.

The Comcast decision, Genachowski said, has created a serious problem. His approach is needed to move forward on broadband initiatives. He said he is asking his FCC colleagues to launch a public process seeking comment on issues surrounding the proposal. This is expected to happen almost immediately.
 
To those of us following this, it's pretty clear that Genachowski is just a figurehead. The clown runnin' the show - his name is Mark Lloyd; one inObama's fleet of czars - over whom nobody (except those driving the czar-specific agenda) has any control. Lloyd is a guy who openly admires the way that Cesar Chavez muzzled public discourse in Venezuela. If you're interested in his agenda, just Google "FCC Diversity Czar"

//greg//
 
Here's an idea. If the court says you don't have the statutory authority to regulate something, instead of trying to "reclassify" it (and lose yet again in court, wasting more of my tax money), then just ask Congress to change the law in order to give them the authority.
 
STOP! Its Elephants* v. Genachowski!

The party of "NO" is aiming to stop FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski's reclassification of broadband services. Says Sen. Kay Baily Hutchison of Texas, "“Congressional action to update the Communications Act is a clear signal to Chairman Genachowski to stand down on his recently announced plans to reclassify broadband services. Instead of an antiquated regulatory scheme imposed by the FCC, Congress will work to develop a legal and regulatory framework appropriate for our modern communications market."

From SkyREPORT
 

Advisability of In-house Surge Arrestors

Roadrunner moving to DOCSIS 3.0

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)