Q. Did they use different balls for Jeter so they could identify the REAL baseball, like they did with Bonds ?
Q. Did they use different balls for Jeter so they could identify the REAL baseball, like they did with Bonds ?
Once again, RECIPIENTS do not pay taxes on gifts. If children earn interest/investment income on their gift, they obviously have to pay taxes on that. Your link deals with when the parents have to file a gift tax return and the rate at which the child's investment income is taxed.Are you a tax expert? If so, I think you need to brush up on your facts:IRS Gift Tax Rules and Limits - Gifts to Children
Once again, RECIPIENTS do not pay taxes on gifts. If children earn interest/investment income on their gift, they obviously have to pay taxes on that. Your link deals with when the parents have to file a gift tax return and the rate at which the child's investment income is taxed.
But isn't all the stuff he's getting compensation for the baseball? If so, then he's liable for taxes on the value of the stuff (minus $8 for the physical value of the ball).As long as its a gift (and not disguised compensation or something else), you as the recipient will not owe taxes. If the gift is a capital asset, the recipient will have to pay capital gains when he/she sells the property.
but the $1,000,000 dollar ball was a "gift" to the YankeesCorrection: If it's a gift he will owe $0 in taxes. Gift Recipients are never taxed. IMO, the seats don't meet the definition of income, but you never know with the IRS. Hopefully Jeter will pick up the tab if the IRS comes knockin.
It will be interesting to see if the IRS wants to consider it "income." Its not really compensation as there was no work performed. It may fall under the catch-all of "other income." There's literally 1000s of pages of revenue rulings discussing what is income and what isn't. My gut says this gets classified as a gift, but Uncle Sam could use the $$$, so you never know.But isn't all the stuff he's getting compensation for the baseball? If so, then he's liable for taxes on the value of the stuff (minus $8 for the physical value of the ball).
If I'm not mistaken, the ball is a $8 gift to Jeter. If he were to sell it for $100, he'd owe taxes on $92.but the $1,000,000 dollar ball was a "gift" to the Yankees
But they gave him lots of stuff in exchange for that ball. That's why I think the IRS will consider it payment for the ball, as otherwise he would not have recieved it.If I'm not mistaken, the ball is a $8 gift to Jeter. If he were to sell it for $100, he'd owe taxes on $92.
Once again, RECIPIENTS do not pay taxes on gifts. If children earn interest/investment income on their gift, they obviously have to pay taxes on that. Your link deals with when the parents have to file a gift tax return and the rate at which the child's investment income is taxed.
I have too much humility to ever call myself an expert at anything, and I certainly am capable of being mistaken, but I have more education dealing with the federal tax code than probably 99% of the US population.You didn't answer my question. Are you a tax expert?
Recipients of gifts do not have to pay taxes on the gift - - they only have to pay tax on any income the gift generates or capital gains tax if the gift is sold. Gifts are not income and the gift tax only applies to the donor.
Lol. It's true and I sure don't blame anyone for not knowing the ins and outs of the crazy tax code.If that's true, then I stand (sit!) corrected.