Wondering what the broadcast resolution is coming down from W5, what the 4DTV output reolution is vs the DSR-410. and is it better still than pizza? All I think I know is that 5.1 surround is capable from 4Dtv. thanks
The one thing I'd like to add (though nothing to do with resolution) is the fact that any network channels people have on the 4dtv ( I think they're most Denver east coast ones) do not exist on the 410. So people who need they're fix of those Ncis, Bones etc type shows will be out of luck. I don't suspect they'll be on the 4dtv anymore either if everyone will be on the W5 satellite.
Its been my one major hurdle with my 410 and has forced me to keep a sub to pizza at the same time. There are some networks on c-band but they hardly carry any of the content that the common FOX, NBC, CBS etc networks show.
Master feeds on the 4D wins hands down. When it comes to 4DTV W5 vs Direct SD it depends on the channel. Some are better on W5 some or better on Direct.
tvropro, are you implying that all digital channels on W5 are of SD quality?
I also have a new Onkyo TX-NR808 AVR that can upscale the signal (s-video out from 920) to the tv's native 720p. It sounds like it'll all be a good match if I decide to go that route.
For the most part, I think CRTs up to the 32" Sharp TV I have used in the past, do a better job of displaying SD than any LCD TV of similar size running SD IMHO.
I agree also. I just got this 50' Sony 3LCD tv to replace a Sony KV-34HS420 which was AWSOME for HD and non HD - BUT it weighed 200LBS! The stand I recently purchased cannot hold that much weight! But I got it at a steal too, so... now I'm left wondering if the quality of the W5 is piss poor and not worth the price they ask for subs. What's going on in the industry? Is everyone selling their MASTERs to the pizzas, and then the pizzas are putting it all on one bird? Is this a monopoly by definition? Thanks everyone for getting me up to speed.For the most part, I think CRTs up to the 32" Sharp TV I have used in the past, do a better job of displaying SD than any LCD TV of similar size running SD IMHO.
Your better off to let the tv do the scaling and upconverting. Allot of cheaper upconverters do a worse job then the tv. If I had to do it over I would have got a 720p set vs the 1080p. 720 will look better with a 480i SD signal than a 1080 set. 720 is closer to 480 so it has to do less filling in the blanks. Actually I have toyed around with picking up a big used 480i bottle and use that for SD. A true 480i set looks better than any HD set that has the signal upconverted when it comes to the SD stuff.
I agree also. I just got this 50' Sony 3LCD tv to replace a Sony KV-34HS420 which was AWSOME for HD and non HD - BUT it weighed 200LBS! The stand I recently purchased cannot hold that much weight! But I got it at a steal too, so... now I'm left wondering if the quality of the W5 is piss poor and not worth the price they ask for subs. What's going on in the industry? Is everyone selling their MASTERs to the pizzas, and then the pizzas are putting it all on one bird? Is this a monopoly by definition? Thanks everyone for getting me up to speed.
The tv won't upscale the signal itself, that's why I'd run the sig through the audio/video reciever
(which has Faroudja DCDi cinema, it does okay) to upscale to 720p, and then to the native 720p tv -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Faroudja name is synonymous with high-quality video processing. The Faroudja technologies incorporated give you the power to bring out the best from both high-definition and standard-definition video content. The Faroudja DCDi Edge™ video processor converts interlaced video signals to progressive scan signals and effectively eliminates video artifacts from HDTV images. The Faroudja DCDi Cinema™ video processor is a more sophisticated version that drastically reduces video noise without sacrificing image quality and sharpness. Both processors can scale standard-definition sources up to 1080i—and DCDi Cinema can additionally upscale to 1080p—for output to HDTVs.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So it sounds as if the signal will get cleaned up just enough to make it look decent on the 720p 3LCD tv.
I also agree, trying to push the signal to a 1080p tv wouldn't come across all that well.
Thanks for all the intel. Really appreciated. HITS is all major movie channels?I'm familiar with the Faroudja, thats like the Cadillac. Try W5 and see how you like it. I really had no complaints while I had it. My subs ran out a week ago or so, and thats it till next year and I see what happens. Remember one thing HITS is feeding that signal to cable companies for distribution so they are limited in how bad they can make it looks since it will get reprocessed again back at the headend before going to consumers.
Thanks for all the intel. Really appreciated. HITS is all major movie channels?