Huh? By that logic, since I want a Rolls but can't afford one, I should be given one. Property is property. Stealing is stealing, even if given to someone who can't afford it because you were "touched" by it. That MAKES you a pirate. A thief.
Amen.
Huh? By that logic, since I want a Rolls but can't afford one, I should be given one. Property is property. Stealing is stealing, even if given to someone who can't afford it because you were "touched" by it. That MAKES you a pirate. A thief.
I think there is a lot of confusion in this thread. How is HDMI somehow linked to the DRM?Please help me out here. If DRM is rendered useless, and falls out of common use, how is it theft if I can now transfer my recordings to a PC-based device, or distribute my legally obtained HDMI output from my ViP622 and send it to multiple rooms?
I usually "get" your posts )), but that's a little bit of a stretch.Because content providers forced DRM in the form of HDCP (High-definition Digital Content Protection) to run over HDMI or... Or... Well, what? What if hardware manufacturers had refused to add HDCP to HDMI? I don't know. Anyhow, it's there.
Because you don't own it, you have a license to use it for certain specific purposes under certain conditions.
That's what I have thought about this. The protections of this type of property were limited to prohibiting distribution of said property.Can't agree w/ that statement. If you are paying for service then you have a right to do with it as you want as long as it's not reselling it to someone else. That would be making a profit on someone else's property. Just keeping it for you own use isn't violating any copyrights. What you are saying is what is behind the crap that promotes DRM. I pay for HBO I have a right to transfer it to another medium for my own use. I feel strongly that this should be the rule of thumb.
If by "movie" you mean an encrypted DVD, you would not be correct. It is unlawful to even attempt to defeat the copy protection scheme (in the USA.)That's what I have thought about this. The protections of this type of property were limited to prohibiting distribution of said property.
I could make a thousand recordings of a movie or tv show or sporting event, so as long as I do not redistribute the material. For home use only.
If by "movie" you mean an encrypted DVD, you would not be correct. It is unlawful to even attempt to defeat the copy protection scheme (in the USA.)
The difference is in the quality of the recording. In the case of a DVD or BD the (illegal) copy is at the same resolution as the original. 480p for the DVD and 1080p for a BD movie....
Funny how you can record OTA & it's legal, but rip a DVD of the same movie & it's not. It's silly to me, but you're right, that's how it is. ...
dishcomm said:Not sure I follow. If I record a movie or tv show, you arfe saying you object to my having the ability to put the recording either on my computer or place it on a DVD for future use? And you object to a simple method by which I can distribute that recording throughout my whole house system?
That is most definitely not true. ATSC PC tuners can record the OTA digital stream direct to disk unaltered. I do it all the time.In the case of the unencrypted OTA offering, one must down-rez via analog output in order to copy.
...ATSC PC tuners can record the OTA digital stream direct to disk unaltered. I do it all the time.
Doh. Of course it's true. My Dish receiver can also record that as well as many other devices. We are talking about making copies not storing the original.!That is most definitely not true. ATSC PC tuners can record the OTA digital stream direct to disk unaltered. I do it all the time.
Don't misunderstand, I'm not the media police nor do I even care who copies what,but there is no "you can say it's illegal." It is illegal as a matter of law.... You can say it's illegal all day, but I never share the copy and I put my original in my media 'closet'. ....
I believe this part of the law is why Dish (and others) get away with building DVRs, and why Dish allows you to move, but not copy the "one backup copy" on the internal drive. Obviously if it's moved, it remains the "one backup copy".Digital media (be it movie, data, music, whatever), is licensed, not purchased. HOWEVER, because of possible defects and the venerable knowledge that physical media WILL go bad, you are allowed ONE BACKUP COPY of any digital media you "license".
goobenet said:Okay, i can't help but chime in because people seem to think this whole digital copy thing is black and white. (pardon the pun)
Now, the movie industry hated the invention of instant replay back in the 60's, they REALLY hated the invention of the VCR (with integrated tuners!) in the 70's, but never really tried to lobby it because there were too many other loopholes. (some days i miss analog)
Then came the digital revolution. DVDs had to be encrypted, and that was defeated. BD player keys, defeated. Now the master key for HDCP which will ALLOW for a "Man-in-the-middle" copy scheme. They really don't like this... it screws up EVERYTHING. Because distributing on disc is one thing, they know it's expensive, they know people will figure out how to copy it. "If man can make it, man can most certainly break it." It even screws up the next generation of "on-demand" delivery. Streaming, because it can now be sucked off the once-thought secure interface. They don't even have to BUY a copy of it anymore! Ut oh!
NOW, the real point people seem to be forgetting is that the MPAA/RIAA shot themselves in the foot a LONG time ago. Go read those documents. Digital media (be it movie, data, music, whatever), is licensed, not purchased. HOWEVER, because of possible defects and the venerable knowledge that physical media WILL go bad, you are allowed ONE BACKUP COPY of any digital media you "license".
Oops.
Of course there's provisions in there, not for public display, not for resale, cannot turn profit, non-transferable, etc. BUT, you are allowed one backup per license you purchase. It's funny that DRM actually PREVENTS you from creating this back up copy because they assume guilt.
I work in radio, i had a media lawyer explain this to me for $400 an hour. Worth every penny.
Speaking of radio and copy protection. Remember when we would get copies of full CD's in the mail with the big sticker that said 'for your convenience, this is NOT copy protected'?
We rebelled when they were sending us CD's that we couldn't rip into our automation and dropped all of a certain labels songs. That ended that real fast. Of course now everything is watermarked, but at least I get to download a wav instead of an mp3.