I know what it's for, my thing is that I don't see where it costs Dish more to provide the programming in 1 room vs 6 rooms. On a hardware side the infrastructure is already in place to provide the bandwidth necessary to get the video stream to your dish, and having 1 tv doesn't cost Dish anymore in bandwidth than 5 tv's. Now, it could be on the licensing end, but I still don't see how. With cable you don't pay any extra to have the content on 1 tv vs 10 tv's unless you get one of their STB's. The digital converters that Comcast provides don't cost anything extra per month. It might be that Dish is able to keep the prices lower per month by licensing out the number of TV's? That still feels like a little bit of a rip off. If you have an extra bedroom that doesn't get used very often you are paying a licensing fee for a TV that doesn't get used much. If i'm missing what the programming fee is covering that costs Dish more to have more TV's in one house, I would like to know.That $7 is not about the equipment. That is the programming fee for an additional room, always has been. That's why no difference if leased or owned.
I do wish it was more like how cable providers do their cable modems. If you rent the modem from the provider, you pay $$ per month. If you buy your own modem, then you save the $$ per month.