dishstandsbyyou gives you a great credit for fox dispute

Status
Please reply by conversation.
The way you guys are always defending Dish, I am going to start calling you "Charlie's Angels", referring to Charlie Ergen, of course.

But it's not about Dish, what we are objecting to is the callousness of Fox to demand an increase for FS1 and FXX as part of the deal. Terms were largely agreed to for Fox News. Dish has a contract for FS1 and FXX that does not expire for some time. THIS IS WHAT THE ISSUE IS. It has nothing to do with Fox News, per se. It has to do with the UNETHICAL, GREEDY, ARROGANT ACTIONS by Fox. This is the issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stormy_2021
"Dish is censoring your news" is an outright, provable falsehood. That is my only point.


Shows which direction the tide is going. Fox is clearly getting hammered on it's ratings, and thus its advertisers, over this. Plus next week do I have to sit through all this b.s. by Fox in the middle of the NFC championship game? Crap. Fox can stuff it.
 
Allowing one contract to be breached in order to resolve a separate contract would be a VERY bad precedent.

If Fox thinks they can breach their FS1/FXX contract to get this one resolved, they are sorely mistaken.
 
I agree that Dish did not charge one dime when they added a channel in the middle of the year. I did not sign a contract that says they will add channels. But I did sign a contract that said I would receive Fox News. Right now I am paying for something that I contracted for that I am not getting. I hope this is settled soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark609
How about that headline...." Fox News goes full Fox News on dispute "..... If that isn't the truth...
If only people could understand how they control and manipulate ?
 
"We agree to charge you this certain amount for a channel for this period of time under contract". "Sorry, we changed our mind, we want more money now even though we agreed to a certain price earlier under contract."

If they were to agree to the price increase on channels already agreed upon in an existing contract (which they won't and shouldn't) then..... "We changed our mind again, we want more money again for the other channels after we raised it once because a contract for another channel came due".
 
Interesting take on the "censorship" charge by Fox in their ads over the weekend. Seems like it may be backfiring to a degree.;)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...n-its-contract-dispute-with-the-dish-network/


blog from washingtonpost..... lmao


How about that headline...." Fox News goes full Fox News on dispute "..... If that isn't the truth...
If only people could understand how they control and manipulate ?

again.....

blog from washingtonpost.....


LMFAO
 
"We agree to charge you this certain amount for a channel for this period of time under contract". "Sorry, we changed our mind, we want more money now even though we agreed to a certain price earlier under contract."

If they were to agree to the price increase on channels already agreed upon in an existing contract (which they won't and shouldn't) then..... "We changed our mind again, we want more money again for the other channels after we raised it once because a contract for another channel came due".

Basically a corporate hostage standoff.....But yet it is capitalism and that's how the game is played....That's why the die hard Fox viewer should just sit down and stand in line....Who is the one entity that would have the power to fix or regulate all these disputes? The one thing they hate the most....
 
Shows which direction the tide is going. Fox is clearly getting hammered on it's ratings, and thus its advertisers, over this. Plus next week do I have to sit through all this b.s. by Fox in the middle of the NFC championship game? Crap. Fox can stuff it.

Not if you DVR it, wait for an hour or so and then begin watching. Completely free of Fox BS.

And I agree completely. The suits at Fox never expected it would play out this way. I find this whole dispute more entertaining than actually watching Fox News! :)
 
I get a laugh when someone thinks they know more than all the lawyers at Dish.

This is what's interesting about this,say I have several channels and I am renewing their contracts,now if I am a willing participate to tell them either pay my price,I want, or I will do everything in my power to hurt your business,there is a word for this in the dictionary and for individuals this would be illegal to do this,but I guess for corporations it's must be different.
Now if those other channels Fox is trying to change,if they disappear from Dish's lineup without Dish's approval, then I would imagine that would be a breach of contract.

Like I said it is interesting and I stand behind Dish to get me my Fox News for the best price.Stand Firm! Charlie!! No Blinking!!
 
Not if you DVR it, wait for an hour or so and then begin watching. Completely free of Fox BS.

And I agree completely. The suits at Fox never expected it would play out this way. I find this whole dispute more entertaining than actually watching Fox News! :)

I am going to watch the NFC championship live. Fox is going to insert this B.S. in there. The fact that Fox is resorting to this shows pretty much they are losing the battle.
 
Status
Please reply by conversation.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Top