I agree that naming Dish's OTT as "Sling TV" may have been a mistake. It's confusing since there was already Slingbox.
I agree that naming Dish's OTT as "Sling TV" may have been a mistake. It's confusing since there was already Slingbox.
Starting with the goofy name: it should be called Dish Now, to avoid confusion. You don't spend 20 years building up a brand name just to toss it out for no reason.
That is correct . All tv video providers are suffering loss. I prefer to watch tv that does not watch me. That's why I like direct broadcasting. I really do not see myself ever being an online only tv subscriber.This is not just a Dish problem, the top five providers (AT&T, Spectrum, Comcast, Dish, Verizon ) all lost 1.1 Million TV Subscribers in the 4th Quarter 2018.
Prices too high, crappy service ( glad I left Comcast with their bitrate starved video), too many other options spells disaster for the traditional TV Providers.
Sent from my iPad using SatelliteGuys
Yeah he's probably a slinger.Charlie must have a thing for Sling and Flex.
Dish Soon®I agree, but Dish Now sounds too much like DirecTV Now. How about Dish Stream?
Dish Soon®
I think naming it SlingTV, a name already associated with Dish in the Sling Media, was a smart move. How many people have gotten passed at Dish and said “I am going to cancel you and go to SlingTV”. I can tell you it is usually a multiple times a day occurrence online. It’s a two-ffer
I think DirecTV Now is rapidly catching up, and it has Fox News and HBO for only $5 a month. Plus Sling TV isn't close to making a profit, nor is anyone else in streaming TV. Google and AT&T can take losses like this and barely feel it. Not so with a smaller company like Dish.
Sure, when you are Number One you charge more. Last time I checked, Fox News and FBN charge providers $1.50 a month, compared to ESPN which charges $7.00 a month, and FNC has more viewers than ESPN.
That is correct . All tv video providers are suffering loss. I prefer to watch tv that does not watch me. That's why I like direct broadcasting. I really do not see myself ever being an online only tv subscriber.
Sent from my SM-G930T using the SatelliteGuys app!
One concern I have is with Dish losing subs, does this mean Dish is less apt to add new channels?
Too late.
Modern TVs have software installed that can detect what you are watching by examining the screen. Even OTA. They plan to use that to target advertising. I forget the name. I plan to block such at the router to stop my new Sony from snitching on me.
Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
Dish Soon®
I look at it this way. Less subs , less buying power for potential new channels and then there is the contract. They can't guarantee a large amount of subscribers for the channel if they are continually losing subs. This means to me that they will charge more for DISH to carry the channel since they can't use volume of subs to guarantee a certain dollar amount to the channel itself. Kind of like what is happened with HBO. DISH couldn't guarantee a certain amount of subs and didn't want to pay a straight dollar amount to HBO ,because it would mean passing the cost on to every subscriber, just to get that guaranteed dollar amount to HBO. DISH loses leverage with every lost sub in my view.One concern I have is with Dish losing subs, does this mean Dish is less apt to add new channels?