Guys if you want to talk about last nights game, then the sport forum is two doors down on the right.
Thanks!
Thanks!
The other possibility is a hold, since it could be interpreted that the contact obstructed Gronk from going after the ball.Can't be Illegal Contact. According to the rule, the QB must still have the ball for there to be illegal contact. Rule 8, Section 4, Article 3. The contact clearly happens after the pass is in the air so the only possibility is PI.
Now, do you think, if there was no contact that Gronk had a chance to CATCH the ball? The ball was underthrown and Gronk's momentum was taking him away from the play allowing the defender to undercut him.
You are assuming PI. Illegal contact does not even have be a catchable ball. Clearly illegal. Weak, WWF-style fail by the refs. Cowardly.
And I hate the Patriots, FWIW.
Dang, I thought I was.....Guys if you want to talk about last nights game, then the sport forum is two doors down on the right.
Thanks!
This thread is so far off topic, I don't know that anything can be considered 'on topic'.Guys if you want to talk about last nights game, then the sport forum is two doors down on the right.
Thanks!
Out of curiousity, why do you think they got huge ratings? Because of the "controversy"? People were either already watching or not at the time of the play. I bet you the ratings were about average for a MNF game.Sort of on topic,I bet ESPN got huge ratings for last nights game.They may try to jack the asking price up again!
but wasn't the game on ESPN?This thread is so far off topic, I don't know that anything can be considered 'on topic'.
Out of curiousity, why do you think they got huge ratings? Because of the "controversy"? People were either already watching or not at the time of the play. I bet you the ratings were about average for a MNF game.
ETA: You should have taken the bet. I was wrong... highest rating for MNF this season (11.2 rating). Still looking to see how past MNF have done.
ETA2: Something doesn't make sense. Week 1's MNF rating is listed as 11.8. So how can last night's game be the "highest rated of the season" (according to Variety)?
Out of curiousity, why do you think they got huge ratings? Because of the "controversy"? People were either already watching or not at the time of the play. I bet you the ratings were about average for a MNF game.
ETA: You should have taken the bet. I was wrong... highest rating for MNF this season (11.2 rating). Still looking to see how past MNF have done.
ETA2: Something doesn't make sense. Week 1's MNF rating is listed as 11.8. So how can last night's game be the "highest rated of the season" (according to Variety)?
I bet it was because Nielsen takes twitter into account now. You would have been right if that weren't the case
Don't know how much of a bad effect it's having on negotiations but it's not good news. http://www.deadline.com/2013/11/abc-disney-dish-network-appeal-hopper-autohop/
http://www-deadline-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/ABC-Dish-Appeal__131120231048.pdf
No doubt the networks will continue to fight Dish over the hopper in court, unless they reach a retransmission agreement with Dish allowing it.
They will keep this BS up in hopes they can find a judge they can pocket.