The difference is that most of those channels only cost about a nickel per subscriber (or even better, they PAY E* to be carried).
petrozio said:We argue about paying a buck or 2 for YES, which not all, but many people will watch, and we sit here idol and pay for the horse racing, bingo, and a zillion home shopping channels. What's wrong with this???? Give us the fricken Yanks!
Maybe I've been too hard on the man, then.juan said:The truth of the matter is Charlie is a closet New York Mets fan!!! This will be proven when the new mets channel shows up on E* next year and YES wont!!!!!!
Chris, you have to understand that people in NY aren't happy unless they have something to whine about.Chris Walker said:I can't believe people in NY are still whining about this. ...
BobMurdoch said:As a Mets fan I root for the.....
1. The Mets.
2. ANYONE playing the Yankees
3. Whomever hasn't won the world series ever/in the longest time.
That means that I am rooting for an Astros-White Sox series. Either can take it, although I am rooting for the White Sox. Although Houston has never been IN the series, they've only been suffering for half a century. The White Sox haven't been in it since Woodrow Wilson was President.
You do understand, of course, that the only proper response to the above statement is... F*** You!!!mdonnelly said:Chris, you have to understand that people in NY aren't happy unless they have something to whine about.
Tom Bombadil said:At this point in time, the YES offer to Dish probably doesn't look too good to Charlie. He's already paid the price for not carrying the channel. Yankee fans have already gone to D* or Cablevision. So the motivation for him to carry this channel has diminished from where it was a couple of years ago when E* had a larger pro-Yankee fan base to protect.
Why pay the freight AFTER the horse has left the barn? Sure E* would be in a better position to add NY area new subs, but the cost for adding YES would likely be pretty high for this comparitively low number of subs. The cost to E* per interested sub at this point would be VERY high.
Thus I think that for YES to be financially viable for E* that Charlie would want a substantially better deal than what he was offered before. But I can't see how YES could offer anything other than what they have already given to D* and Cablevision. So it would surprise me if they strike a deal anytime soon.
Here's another thought...JohnL said:This is the reason "YES" is not on Dish Network. Dish also had counter offers to carry the "YES" channel and pay ALL Subscriber Subscription revenue to "YES" from those that purchased it Ala Carte. The Uplink and all other related costs were to be paid for by Dish. "YES" said no, if they truely believe that their product was so "Must Watch TV" then they would have agreed to this type of carriage agreement.
Here's a thought maybe the Yankees aren't as loved or wanted as "YES" believe they are.
I like that Dish has drawn a line in the sand on this issue to discourage all other Teams from these same tactics.
Really? How?The point is that Cablevision has and did get a better offer for carriage of "YES" than Dish could get.
So, how long have you been working on the negotiations? What? You haven't been? Ah. So, your just making assumptions based on the stuff Charlie says on the Chats. I can see why you'd believe him. He's never been less than 100% truthful on the Chats in the past.JohnL said:Tom,
The point is that Cablevision has and did get a better offer for carriage of "YES" than Dish could get.
John