Lets see. Direct adds 170,000 net subs, Dish loses 29,000 net subs (the second quarter in a row of sub losses), and you conclude that receivers fees did not have a big effect because they did not lose as much as OTHERS on this forum thought they would? Should they not have been adding subs instead of losing subs for 2 consecutive quarters (and it WILL be 3 consecutive when the next report comes out)?
Let me clarify. I am not predicting that dish WILL continue to lose subs, I am commenting on a specific point made by another poster. IF they do continue to lose subs, THEN their profits will also go down.That is true, but at the rate they are going, if nothing changes, it will take a very long time for that to happen.
It didn't? Did they not lose subs?And when that prediction doesn't come true, like the last one over the equipment fees didn't, which quarter will you pick then?
They will not be profitable if they keep losing subs.Since the trend is losing net subscribers, no the equipment fees didn't cause anywhere near the churn the naysayers about Dish had kept telling us we would all see.
Dish is still very profitable and is still providing the most national HD channels to those of us not hung up on sports and PPV.
It didn't? Did they not lose subs?
They will not be profitable if they keep losing subs.
What does a few Dish haters on THIS site that emotionally predicted worse doom have to do with how good or bad they actually did?Yes they did lose subs, but way less than the naysayers were predicting.
The last 4 quarters combined, Dish has gained 438,000 net subs. Yes, during a one year period, they did very well. This was mainly as a result of one very strong quarter during their "Why Pay More?" campaign. Probably correlating with the advertising. If so, it shows that good advertising helps.Over the last year they've increased I think, I remember the big deal they made about hitting 14 m around December last year. The two gain quarters were alot bigger than the two loss quarters. Big picture they're doing fine.
The last 4 quarters combined, Dish has gained 438,000 net subs. Yes, during a one year period, they did very well. This was mainly as a result of one very strong quarter during their "Why Pay More?" campaign. Probably correlating with the advertising. If so, it shows that good advertising helps.
When the Q4 report comes out the yearly numbers will not look that good (the actual fiscal year of 2010) as they WILL lose more in Q4 than Q3
Conjecture and conclusion based on patterns and information. I have been right so far. I even predicted they will lose subs this quarter and I said it will be less than 100kYou can see the future too?
You can see the future too?
Dont know if this belongs here
The FSNs (and other Fox properties) weren't down in Q3. The channels went dark on October 1st and lit back up on October 29th. Any impact from the Fox spat will likely show up in Q4 or later.