Sorry, but I fail to see anything wrong with this.
racerx said:I fail to see why there's anything wrong with that, that's the point of a commitment period. You have filled your commitment and your obligation.
The marriage analogy is bunk. A marriage is not a business transaction (or is not supposed to be), and the expectation of loyalty and commitment is not comparable.
Many of you are missing the point.
There is nothing wrong with changing your provider after your commitment period (or even beforehand and then paying the mandatory penalty). It is legal and each side in the transaction is free to do business or not.
But right or wrong was not the topic.
The point was the business point of view of the cable or satellite provider. Quote "Dish Network must hate returning customers". And the marriage analogy was not to imply any moral aspects, but merely to put the reader into the point of view of someone spending a lot of money in order to enter a relationship.
The customer they want is the one that stays after the commitment period.
A CEO who allows another $600 package of freebies to be given to someone who changed providers every 2 years is an idiot.
A guy who gives a 2 carat diamond ring to a woman who has been divorced four times is an idiot.
Last edited: