3+ years out I'm guessing?
The question is what are they going to do with this satellite location. With 25 degrees of separation they could put it on EA, but given the contours, one wonders how they will do national programming for the northern US. Probably would have been better to design a spot beam satellite for the location then they could do even more locals on EA.
when is it going to be launched?
went back and got the E8 77W Mexico footprint for comparison. Sure looks like it is designed for the DishMexico service.
Perhaps there is a deal in the works where Dish gets most if not all of 77 W primarily for spotbeam use in the U.S. in exchange for Mexican use of most if not all of 86.5 W. Based on a late 2010 completion date, both the 86.5 W satellite and the QuetzSat 1 could be launched within 6 months of each other. Besides for the interference problems with the Canadian DBS slots at 82 W and 91 W, the 77 W slot providing spotbeams fits with Dish's Eastern Arc plan. Dish already has a dish to get 61.5 W, 72.7 W and 77 W but adding 86.5 W requires a bigger more expensive dish. Dish also needs more spotbeam capacity for HD locals and the combined CONUS capacity at 61.5 W and 72.7 W should be adequate for a full MPEG-4 system once most if not all internationals are moved off 61.5 W and Dish deploys another satellite to 61.5 W to be able to use the 4 TPs they cannot use there currently.
I don't know about the regs, but technically this problem is addressed with a bigger dish. The bigger the dish, the greater it's resolving power.Also - if 4.5 degree Ku separation is such a big deal, then how does Echostar at 77w not interfere with Echostar CONUS beams at 72.7w?
I don't know about the regs, but technically this problem is addressed with a bigger dish. The bigger the dish, the greater it's resolving power.
Also - if 4.5 degree Ku separation is such a big deal, then how does Echostar at 77w not interfere with Echostar CONUS beams at 72.7w?