we get them in SD so unless HD is just being blocked which Tony thinks is not the case and is working on it
I doubt there would be a reason to block HD if you get SD, so ya, why are they blocked? Hope you get that resolved.
we get them in SD so unless HD is just being blocked which Tony thinks is not the case and is working on it
I do agree you need to get what you pay for, otherwise Dish needs to lower your cost to the channels you actually get. And if 61.5 would serve more people instead of 72 I just don't know why they are migrating.
But your point "C" I do not agree with. Yes, in time, but not if it means raising rates to pay for it. There are probably still millions that have MPEG2 equipment. Even people who post here and are up to date on what is going on still have at least one MPEG2 receiver.
Agreed that it is too much for them to take on for the entire country....but customers with Easter/Western arc coverage are getting what they pay for, over 3 satellites instead of the two (110/119) we get in PR/VI. I was proposing upgrading all PR/VI customers to MPEG4.....selfish, yes....but it would pay for itself in new customers.
Hi
In my opinion, again, what Dish has to do is move all HD to 61.5 like they had. And that way they would have the ability to deliver full HD lineup to PR/USVI while not affecting anybody in CONUS. This is the only cost effective, immediate, reasonable and just way of providing a solution that would benefit everybody including Dish. It just blows my mind away how doesn't anyone at Dish Network can figure this out. This is the fastest and most complete solution available, their is no technical reason on why not doing it. I would only assume that they just are overseeing this fact because if that is not the case then their just dumb or have a deliberate intention of not doing it.
Can anyone explain why is this proposition not feasible? Is there some technical reason I am overseeing? Please explain.
I believe that Dish doesn't have space to add more HD channels in the (110, 119, 129), so getting HD from 110 its not an option.
because they want all subs to have a single Dish solution with an EA or WA setup, I don't see then wavering from this. So the only solution is mpeg4 so we have more channels per transponder.
Dish wants a one dish solution, worst idea ever. Dish doesn't get that we live in a tropical island, we get a lot of rain. If I change my dishes with the garbage they are offering now, I will get rain fade everyday. The idea to have all the channels on mpeg 4 is great, but the one dish solution not.
I could be completely wrong, but I thought there were some empty PR/USVI spotbeam transponders on 110 and 119. I remember reading a post by Digiblur, a long time ago, were he listed transponders and their spotbeams, and there were a couple not in use. Maybe they have changed?
I have a one dish 40 inch, what size do you have. Also since Alaska and Hawaii can see the 128, why not take there spot beam off the 119/110 to free up more space. I am sure there
are a lot more customers here then either of those 2 places combined. Of course they are both states and have senators
I have one 6 footer and two 4 footers. Do you have rain fade?
They are using tp 18 and 29 (110 )mirroring SD from 119, don't know the reason. Maybe some kind of service in Cuba.
If they eliminate those we could get 14 hd channels.
I believe that Dish doesn't have space to add more HD channels in the (110, 119, 129), so getting HD from 110 its not an option. 61.5 its the only option to get more HD to the Caribbean. Dish doesn't want that, but it's the only option. For example 61.5 has lots of MPEG 4 SD channels with the HD equivalent on 72. Who watch SD when the can see it in HD? Some people may argue that they recorded their shows in SD to save space but with the EHD thats not longer a valid point. I said get rid SD on the eastern arc. That will create more space for HD at least for the Caribbean. Anyway they don't have to do that, they just have to stop the migration. I have 3 dishes for a long time, those who don't, can add a dish. It will be cheaper to add a Dish. I can't speak for everyone, but I know that people will not mind to add a dish if you tell them they will be getting more HD channels. They don't have to put all the Hd channels on 61.5, only the ones that the Caribbean doesn't get.
Seriously, who watch the MPEG4 SD channels with an HD version on the eastern arc? If the receiver by default takes you to the hd feed first, who will change the channel to watch the sd version. If someone does that, please explain why.
If I am missing what you are saying, forgive me. But I think you are missing a huge point. You can not look at 119/110 AND look at 61.5 as a way to get a full package. That's not how it works. 119/110/129 makes a complete package, and 61.5/72.5 and in some cases 77 makes a complete package. That's how dish does, and I can tell you if they didn't alot of New England would not be able to get HD. (trees - 119/110/129 requires a much lower view of sight)
Saying there are HD channels that are duplicated is not correct, it isn't duplicated for those that do not see or get the 119/110/129 sats.
Leaving the HD on 61.5 to me would solve this as many have said. I don't know why the switch to 72 but then I'm not employed by Dish.
I have one other question. Is there any chance the channels not being shown, (blacked -out) are not allowed to be sold to PR by Dish?
Of course just to put another nail in our HD coffin, the platinum package gets moved back to 61.5. I think Dish is just messing with us in PR. Maybe we should all change our addresses to state side just to force Dish's
hand