I did provide a long winded explanation didn't I?
Sorry.
This is entirely different, and if I could get PM'd some account numbers from anyone who is getting the "out of area" message, I will see what I can do. This message is typically a related to blackout, not unlike sports blackouts, to a certain zip and it may be something that unintentionally happened during some change, but I can research exactly what the deal is. Also, if you can provide the channel names and numbers, and what satellite/transponder they come from (along with signal strength), that would help me get to a resolution. I can honestly say I have not heard of that message appearing on any other channel then I described, until now. Thanks for clarifying that there is an actual error message other then a "no signal" type thing. Also, let me know if you happen to see Attention 013 on any of those channels as well, which is more what I was thinking would be present (usually an authorization issue due to a missing orbital/transponder combination or lack of signal from the same).
As far as the full array of channels, I still believe there is somewhat of a limitation regarding transponders that carry the channels and the footprint that they make (which goes back to my original posts) based on angles and sat positioning, along with bandwidth limitations due to MPEG2 compression. Research lends that, depending of course on what is being sent, somewhere between 6 and 12 channels can be provided per transponder in that form of compression. Therefore, to give a full array of 250 channels (assuming that there are no other packages with different channels) there would need to be a minimum of 22 transponders (rounding up) designated to PR/VI in order to support just the AT250. Add in channels not found in the AT250, such as some DISH Latino and international channels, and the requirement grows larger. Now combine that with the location of the satellite and angles available to reach the same location, and you start running into the limitations I posted about earlier. The previous information I provided, based on everything I had researched up to that point, suggests the problem that I was eluding to. No contradictory information had been found at the time of those posts. The conversion to MPEG4 compression (and the associated switch on gear, etc) should help the situation considerably by freeing up bandwidth. I will, however, continue to search for both supporting and dissenting information and may stumble across something, or someone, that can help us get to a more satisfactory answer. As always it takes time, but I would be glad to investigate further and see if I can provide more information on the issue.
As far as any thoughts about a contract issue, I find that doubtful. If a customer pays for a channel set, especially premium channels, I believe that whether or not they have signal or support, some portion (not sure what percentage) of the "charge" for the channels goes to the programmers. HBO subscribers, whether or not they can receive the channels due to signal or any other limitation, still increase the payment due when we cut the check to HBO. I cannot imagine that HBO would "discount" anything because a few (if not all) of the channels cannot be sent to a particular area. Someone subscribed to the package, we collect money on that package, HBO expects to be paid 100% of whats due to them. Just my thoughts, and as always I can be wrong.