It should be in AT120!!! (as that is what I have.)Yes sir, I am expecting it to be in at least the Top250. Channels from there have already migrated down.
But, BBH is okay, too, as I have that as well.
It should be in AT120!!! (as that is what I have.)Yes sir, I am expecting it to be in at least the Top250. Channels from there have already migrated down.
That is why I never got why the networks and studios originally fought tooth and nail against online streaming.Oh no, the exact opposite. Have you watched regular programming (Not Premium HBO type) online? You can't skip the commercials. All I wanted to do was to see the last two minutes of Shark Tank (I erased by mistake) online at ABC, I had to watch every commercial on the way to get to the end. That is what everyone is crowing about watching online?? Sure it's free because you have to watch every stinkin commercial.....
And now CBS online charges you for the privilege of watching commercials.
When 84in displays become economically viable, they will become mainstream. It's really quite that simple.3. 84-inch TVs are never going to be mainstream
Never. Ever. Never ever. Like I said earlier, I have a 102-inch screen. I've also reviewed an 80-inch Sharp LCD. And let me tell you, it dominates the room. It's massive. There is a significant difference between a screen (effectively, the wall), and a Device of Unusual Size. Enthusiasts might be OK with this thing in their room, but most people won't. Ask your spouse. Ask your spouse's friends. Screen sizes have been inching upward, but not linearly with price. More specifically, the prices of big-big screens have fallen much faster than their sales have increased. I don't know what the upper limit is for what the average consumer decides is "too big" for their room, but I'm positive there is an upper limit, and this limit is far smaller than screens that need 4K.
Key word being "when"When 84in displays become economically viable, they will become mainstream.
And, the keywords in Voyager's post were "Never. Ever. Never ever.", which is just plain wrong.Key word being "when"
I know, because it takes both hands at all times to eat, and I don't use utensils.By the way, Auto Hop is great if you're eating dinner while watching TV.
Yeah. One time, on an "audiophile" forum, some poster said I should heed another poster's advice as he had spent as much on his sound system as he did on his house.Ahhh, the folks who justify their purchases based on defending how much they paid for technology.
I do. And, so do others who watch quality program with plots and dialog and stuff that matters happening in the first 30 seconds after the commercial break.Give me a 60 second skip and I will gladly miss 30 seconds of programming when scheduled that way, since very little ever happens in 30 seconds anyway. Sometimes I hit the skip button too many times, but never back up to see what I missed. Who gives a S**t.
That is why I never got why the networks and studios originally fought tooth and nail against online streaming.
But then you need to get all those movies... again. 4k is better but to upgrade everything again for the finite increase of quality... it just seems bonkers.
WAF is likely to put a brake on that. Wall screens showing artwork when not showing TV, indistinguishably, might tip the balance. After we are all dust and 451 has come to pass.When 84in displays become economically viable, they will become mainstream. It's really quite that simple.
I know, right? Pressing the skip ahead key is such a major PITA.
Think of all the things you can no longer do with that finger during commercial breaks.
It's like so 2010.