DirecTV NOW is not included ESPN or Disney! For $20/m, Sling TV already included both channels. I believe Sling TV is better choice now.
Where are you getting this information? Early reports show deals already made with Disney (ESPN)DirecTV NOW is not included ESPN or Disney! For $20/m, Sling TV already included both channels. I believe Sling TV is better choice now.
As I posted earlier in this thread, I still contend that a major component of the DirecTV Now initiative is to test the FCC and its stance on zero rating content. The pricing of this package seems rather unsustainable but if it's a probe by AT&T to push the limits of net neutrality that would explain the pricing somewhat. If the FCC backs down I would expect to see price increases on the horizon.FCC Questions AT&T Over DirecTV Now Pricing Plan And Impact On Competition
deadline.com/2016/11/fcc-questions-att-over-directv-now-pricing-plan-and-impact-on-competition-1201852650/
Because it can disadvantage OTT services like Netflix, Amazon, YouTube, etc. Zero rating means At&T will not charge for bandwidth usage if you use their service(DirecTV Now) but they will charge for bandwidth if you any other service like those I just mentioned. It's anti-competitive behavior. Internet service comes under the purview of the FCC.
Sounds pretty logical if you own the services involved why should you not use them to the best of your ability ?Because it can disadvantage OTT services like Netflix, Amazon, YouTube, etc. Zero rating means At&T will not charge for bandwidth usage if you use their service(DirecTV Now) but they will charge for bandwidth if you any other service like those I just mentioned. It's anti-competitive behavior. Internet service comes under the purview of the FCC.
Because data transmission over the Internet is regulated by the FCC, Internet providers are classified as Common Carriers which means they are regulated by the FCC.Sounds pretty logical if you own the services involved why should you not use them to the best of your ability ?
IF Netflix had thier own Internet, you can be damn sure they would want thier service for thier customers to not have to charge for bandwidth while on thier internet.Because data transmission over the Internet is regulated by the FCC, Internet providers are classified as Common Carriers which means they are regulated by the FCC.
What you're suggesting is that Neflix, et al should go and build their own Internet service. This is why I believe DirecTV Now is as much a test of net neutrality as it is a simple video service, AT&T wants to see if they can, in essence, get away with it.
With the change of administration in Washington, this may all become a moot point anyway as they will very likely install pro-business commissioners and personnel at the FCC as well as other government agencies that are tasked with watching out for the consumer.
Starz said it will launch eight of its premium channels on the new AT&T streaming service DirecTV Now.
When DirecTV Now launches later this month, the service will feature channels including Starz, Starz Encore and Starz Encore Westerns.
Don't forget that eventually they will have multiple packages of channels at different price points ... just thinking that this will happen.This chart shows how tiny the margins will be on AT&T's new $35 streaming TV service
http://www.businessinsider.com/directv-now-profit-margins-chart-2016-11
Not able to get DIRECTV? Sign up to DIRECTV NOW and stream TV live & on demand. No equipment. No annual contract. No hassle.