Part of the issue is there is other programming such as collage and local sports programming such as IHSA (highschool sports) that is locally produced by Comcast Sports Net in HD. Were missing out on all of that allso.
Add more HD.
More HD went up in testing today.
That's the problem. Under the current setup on Dish not every game is available in HD even though an RSN is broadcasting it in HD. If all of our HD games were always available I'm sure most of us wouldn't care if the RSN was part-time or full-time.
I agree it is a problem. But, which makes people more happy?
1. Having channel X in HD all the time nationally
2. Having an RSN that serves just one market area in HD
Since Dish does not offer MLB EI, the problem is contained to just a few markets that overflow their capacity, not people nationwide.
I do see Dish eventually going full time all HD RSNs. Perhaps they are putting it off until after the conversion of 110/119 to 8PSK. When they do that they will have a lot more capacity.
Most just want to see the games in their market (primary and alt games) Most spot beams would cover the region with the HDRSN of their market & the Alternate that you get with the sports pack. So it could be possible that you would pick up a couple of other RSN's in full time from overlapping spots. As far as space on spot beams, if there is any to make this a reality, that I have no Idea.
Yep, The way I look at is Dish is eventually going to have to go full time with there rsn's. ....
General consensus is that putting them on spots would be ok in lue of taking up full transponder space as people cant get the games outside of their market anyhow as dish doesnt have MLB extra innings.
Most just want to see the games in their market (primary and alt games) Most spot beams would cover the region with the HDRSN of their market & the Alternate that you get with the sports pack. So it could be possible that you would pick up a couple of other RSN's in full time from overlapping spots.
That's the problem. Under the current setup on Dish not every game is available in HD even though an RSN is broadcasting it in HD. If all of our HD games were always available I'm sure most of us wouldn't care if the RSN was part-time or full-time.
The basic package that Dish used to compare in their ads is the same one Direct is using in this ad.So now D* is claimming FX AMC isn't in Dish Networks base package, but it is in D* tv's?
Well That sounds like more lies.
Really?? Family pack Has these channels??
Not in our Basic package like yours?
Again really??
How do you know? It doesn't say Choice pack for $58.99 per month.The basic package that Dish used to compare in their ads is the same one Direct is using in this ad.
This is a commercial getting back at Dish for comparing their Family pack to Direct's Choice pack, while at the same time claiming the same TV for less. Dish is the one who chose to use Direct's Choice pack in their commercial.How do you know? It doesn't say Choice pack for $58.99 per month.
It says Base Pack.
Dodger Here is the Top 120 Channel Line up.This is a commercial getting back at Dish for comparing their Family pack to Direct's Choice pack, while at the same time claiming the same TV for less. Dish is the one who chose to use Direct's Choice pack in their commercial.
BTW, we are going back and forth making the same comments on two different threads. Lets agree to post only on one thread, the one in the Direct forum. Sounds good?
I don't recall seeing Direct mention price anywhere in this commercial.Except that Dish also compares their AT200 pack, which has most of the missing channels, and DirecTV fails to make that comparison. Also, they then have the audacity of giving their 1 year promotional costs, when Dish was comparing the actual cost.
I don't recall seeing Direct mention price anywhere in this commercial.