Directv dispute with Viacom IS OVER!
- Thread starter SFGuy
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 1K
- Views 124K
- Status
No they are not paying for it. But they have the option to at a set price if they choose to add the channel.
While I am happy that Direct and Viacom came to a meeting of the minds and got the channels back that some people liked, I am also saddened that Epix wasn't included as either an a la carte` option or brought into the HD Extra Pack.
I actually like they brought the channels back without Epix, since that isnt what Viacom wanted. I think it's more to prove a point, and I bet Directv adds it later to the xtra pack. It could also be that Viacom wanted in more than the xtra pack, and I do not agree with that at all.
The question of course is if there are package restrictions in the deal that DIRECTV does not like. The option is not really any good if they want it in a package that DIRECTV does not want to offer it in. At least it looks like Viacom gave in and DIRECTV does not have to offer Epix.
I called it at 11:00PM last night in this thread. Not that it was that hard, Viacom was heading for a catastrophe. I'm betting they caved big time on this whimpered away.
Here is what I posted at 9:33 last night...
https://twitter.com/SatelliteGuys/status/226127567768416256
That was after talking to someone claiming to be in the know of the discussions... he told me was just waiting for legal and the signatures to be signed. Then the last update from DIRECTV seemed to verify what I was told.
https://twitter.com/SatelliteGuys/status/226127567768416256
That was after talking to someone claiming to be in the know of the discussions... he told me was just waiting for legal and the signatures to be signed. Then the last update from DIRECTV seemed to verify what I was told.
DIRECTV and Viacom Reach Agreement to Renew Carriage of Viacom’s Networks – Blog.Viacom
Viacom failed to add to their press release, "We apologize for being such a**holes." I'm sure it was simply an oversight in their haste to release the statement.
Eric
Viacom failed to add to their press release, "We apologize for being such a**holes." I'm sure it was simply an oversight in their haste to release the statement.
Eric
The question now is will Viacom try doing this again to any provider or did they learn their lesson?
The way they should have done it, is while negoations were still going on they should have kept the channels on DIRECTV. Then after a longer set period (30 days, 60 days) then pull the channels and put out a release saying something like this...
"Dear Viacom Watcher, we know you love our channels and we thank you for watching! Unfortunately our contract with (provider name here) expired 60 days ago, we have been trying to negotiate with them in good faith over the past 60 days however there has not been any positive progress in these negotiations so we have had to pull our channels off of (provider name) this was not something we wanted to do but we were left with no choice. We believe we should be paid fairly for our channels and we know times are tough for many so we have been trying our best and will continue trying our best to negoatate a fair deal for both of us. Thank you for your understanding as we work with (provider name) to bring your favorite Viacom channels back to their lineup."
I would have ZERO problem if it was done that way.
The way they should have done it, is while negoations were still going on they should have kept the channels on DIRECTV. Then after a longer set period (30 days, 60 days) then pull the channels and put out a release saying something like this...
"Dear Viacom Watcher, we know you love our channels and we thank you for watching! Unfortunately our contract with (provider name here) expired 60 days ago, we have been trying to negotiate with them in good faith over the past 60 days however there has not been any positive progress in these negotiations so we have had to pull our channels off of (provider name) this was not something we wanted to do but we were left with no choice. We believe we should be paid fairly for our channels and we know times are tough for many so we have been trying our best and will continue trying our best to negoatate a fair deal for both of us. Thank you for your understanding as we work with (provider name) to bring your favorite Viacom channels back to their lineup."
I would have ZERO problem if it was done that way.
And in the court of public opinion, it would make Viacom look like the good guys and DirecTV look like the bad guys.
Is there a list of what channels changed packages because of this? From what I can tell, MTV2, VH1, and Spike are no longer available on Choice and Nick Toons now is. That's just from me comparing Directv's Site to the list on the sticky on this forum so I could be off or completely wrong
Viacom posted the agreement on their FB page and most of the people responding are tearing them apart, big time.
Viacom | Facebook
Viacom | Facebook
Ahh yes, that makes sense. I misread the original statement at first as they had already paid for it as part of the new agreement and could add it at any time.
I believe Viacommies will try it again with other providers until 1 of those provides cave in unlike Directv didnot cave in
Viacom is greedy and they will continue doing it to every company
Nah if that were the case, then the channel would already be turned on. DIRECTV would not pay for a channel and then not carry it.
- Status
