I read it too, and wonder why LEM only has one post...THIS POST...on that forum. Regardless of the "authenticated email", I'm calling troll.
CPanther95 said:We all know it's true, it just never would be officially admitted by D*. If the sh** hit the fan for this CSR, it would be ironic that a CSR would get in trouble for being too knowledgable.
arxaw said:It's all about quantity over quality.
syphix said:I read it too, and wonder why LEM only has one post...THIS POST...on that forum. Regardless of the "authenticated email", I'm calling troll.
Hogarth said:newsposter -- did you read that web page? There's not only visual degradation, but also the bit rate is much, much lower.
There are thresholds for minimum bitrates at specific resolutions.
Plywodstatebum said:No one broadcast Full HD so I guess it will never change unless people complain.
lou_do said:If you don't complain and let them know you are not satisfied with "lite HD', they will leave it that way. A satellite provider's main concern is getting as many signals into a satellite as possible, as we have seen here consumers are more concerned with picture quality.
At least when you complain they get the message that consumers are not happy with it.