How could they possibly NOT up convert? Or do you distinguish between upconversion and scaling?
Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
If you put a 1080i program on it, you get 1080 on the screen.
How could they possibly NOT up convert? Or do you distinguish between upconversion and scaling?
Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
If you put a 1080i program on it, you get 1080 on the screen.
It's got to scale. It's a fixed pixel display. Or it will be picture framed.
Yep. UHD/"4K" may breathe new life into 3D.
The larger monopolies will have no problem. It is going to be the small Mom& Pop's, that can not afford the scalers, that will leave their customers behind.Hmmm, that would make sense,, if you watch something on a 1080p panel, it upconverts to 1080p ...
So if I watch the local news or something like that, it's gonna show it in 4k ?
I don't think the local cable company could handle that.
you nailed it. big dish rocks. little dish sputters along but has the $$$. sadI remember when I got my c band dish in 1992. The first thing I saw was an ITC feed of the Toronto Blue Jays game. The picture quality was not much different than today's hd picture.
There was an article published this past weekend, that we have surpassed the resolution that our eyes can perceive.
So far I have not been able to see regular programming when out at the local Retail shops, I have seen the Samsung at BB most recently, looks real nice, but your looking at THIER demo.
I want to see it on for a football game or a TV show that I watch ...
The retail places are saying that it upconverts 1080 to 4k, but I don't think so.
I think I'll go by my friends place that have a Sony 4k available to play with and put everyday TV on it for a bit ... (They are a Hi End A/V store, not a Box store.)
Well it has to scale 1080p/1080i/720p to 4K or it wouldn't fit the screen. 4K is about 4 times the resolution of 1080p. If they didn't up scale that would mean picture using 1920x1080 resolution would only be able to fill a quarter of the screen on a 4K TV. The scaling process blows up that 1080p signal to use all the real estate on the screen. That doesn't mean that your 1080i Directv signal will look like a native 4K signal on a 4K TV.
This works the same on current TVs. If you buy a 1080p TV and watch 720p or 480i content on it the TV has to scale that to 1080p. That doesn't mean 480i TV looks like 1080p. The display always puts out it's native resolution even if the signal is of lower quality. That's why I don't want to pay for a 4K TV yet. Right now it would be like buying a 1080p TV and only watching SD content on it. There is really no benefit until you have some 4K content to watch.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
I got to see the Sammy 4k with a direct D* feed for a NFL game at HH Greg over the weekend. I wasn't impressed. Looked about as good as any of the other same sized 240hz sets. Which was only marginally better than the same sized 120hz sets.
The 4k demo they had running looks really good but when the put up the 1080p vs the 4k split screen you realize how insignificant the changes are given:
1. What they show is obviously "best case"
2. by the time we see that as consumers much of that tiny difference will be compressed right out or not visible unless you are sporting a 70inch plus set and sitting closer than you probably should.
Sorry but I was excited about HD, holy crap I'm still waiting to get actual broadcasted 1080p a decade plus later and 4k just does nothing for me. Mostly because its hard to get excited when I'm still waiting for current tech to hit its speed limit and likely will for a long time forward.
Oh yeah, now OLED is something to get excited about. I got to see the curved Samsung set at Brandmart in West Palm beach and that thing is absolutely gorgeous.