D* and NRTC end exclusive distribution agreement.

Status
Please reply by conversation.
DirecTV, NRTC End Original Sales Deal

The National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative and DirecTV announced this morning that they amended their original sales agreement, a move that effectively ends NRTC's exclusive DirecTV service distribution contract within rural areas.

DirecTV said with the new agreement, the NRTC's separate agreements for sale of the satellite TV service with its members and affiliates have been terminated, with an effective date of 90 days from today.

However, NRTC and DirecTV have further agreed to enter into a new relationship that will provide NRTC members an opportunity to continue to participate as non-exclusive DirecTV retailers and service providers. NRTC's members will be able to sell their exclusive contract rights to DirecTV, and turn around and enter into agreements to continue marketing and selling DirecTV services on a non-exclusive basis, the cooperative said. "This is a classic win-win situation for NRTC's members and DirecTV. NRTC's members will be able to realize value from the businesses that they have so successfully built over the last decade while DirecTV will be able to retain NRTC's member base as part of its new national retail network," said Bob Phillips, president and CEO at NRTC. The NRTC has had exclusive rights to distribute most DirecTV services in rural NRTC territories since 1994
 
Just got this in my email.

Looks like Pegasus may want to fight...

Pegasus Satellite Television Responds To NRTC Termination Notice
BALA CYNWYD, PA, June 2, 2004 - Pegasus Communications Corporation (NASDAQ: PGTV) announced that Pegasus Satellite Television, Inc. and certain of its affiliates ("Pegasus Satellite Television") received today notice from the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative ("NRTC") purporting to terminate Pegasus Satellite Television's exclusive distribution arrangements with NRTC, which provide to Pegasus Satellite Television the exclusive rights to distribute DIRECTV services in specified rural territories of the United States. The notice provides that this action is based upon an agreement between NRTC and DIRECTV, Inc. to terminate the distribution agreement between NRTC and DIRECTV. Ted S. Lodge, President and Chief Operating Officer of Pegasus Satellite Television, stated: "We are still evaluating the notice purporting to terminate our agreements and a related cash offer , which we received this morning with no prior notification. We categorically reject DIRECTV's and NRTC's assertion that they can terminate our agreements, and intend to vigorously protect our rights. We believe the strong arm tactics demonstrated by these actions today further evidence both the true value of our assets and the very strong desire of DIRECTV and NRTC to take value away from our stakeholders."

About Pegasus

Pegasus Communications Corporation through its subsidiaries provides digital satellite television to rural households throughout the United States and owns and/or operates television stations affiliated with CBS, FOX, UPN and The WB networks.

Safe Harbor

Any statements which are not historical facts are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and will be considered forward-looking statements. Such forward- looking statements may be identified with words such as "we expect," "we predict," "we believe," "we project," "we anticipate," and similar expressions.

Pegasus' actual results may differ materially from those expressed or indicated by forward-looking statements. There can be no assurance that these future events, including pending transactions, will occur as anticipated or that Pegasus results will be as estimated.

Factors which can affect our performance and future events are described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and include the following: general economic and business conditions, nationally, internationally, and in the regions in which we operate; catastrophic events, including acts of terrorism; relationships with and events affecting third parties like DirecTV, Inc. and the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative; litigation with DirecTV, Inc., including the judgment with respect to the Seamless Marketing litigation; the recent change of control of DirecTV, Inc.; demographic changes; existing government regulations and changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations; competition, including the provision of local channels by a competing direct satellite provider in markets where DirecTV does not offer local channels; the loss of any significant numbers of subscribers or viewers; changes in business strategy or development plans; the cost of pursuing new business initiatives; an expansion of land-based communications systems; technological developments and difficulties; our ability to obtain intellectual property licenses and to avoid committing intellectual property infringement; our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; our significant indebtedness; and the availability and terms of capital to fund the expansion of our businesses.

Persons are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Contact Information:

Press:
Cheryl Crate
Pegasus Communications Corporation
(703) 892-4230
cheryl.crate@pgtv.com

or

Michael Freitag or Victoria Weld
Kekst and Company
(212) 521-4800

Investors:
Andrew Smith
Pegasus Communications Corporation
(610) 934-7381
andrew.smith@pgtv.com
 
I despise Pegasus and they are the sole reason I don't have Directv. I hate to say that about any company but they are a royal pain to try to deal with.
 
I'm glad to not get scammed $4.95 each month for nothing anymore. Hey, don't laugh... that's a meal for me.

I can also get my TiVO service waived. Yahoooo!!!!!!
 
re pegasus

Is there money to be made off this as an installer?

Can I market direc to my extensive peg. customer list?

Glad to get rid of pegasus.
 
The latest developments, courtesy Multichannel News:

Pegasus: DirecTV, NRTC Trying to Destroy Us
-- Multichannel News, 6/15/2004 4:46:00 PM

Pegasus Communications Corp. subsidiary Pegasus Satellite Television Inc. filed a lawsuit late Monday against DirecTV Inc. and the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative.

The suit -- an adversary complaint filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maine -- charged the defendants with “acting independently and in concert in an effort to destroy Pegasus and steal its business for their own enrichment in violation of substantial fiduciary, contractual and other duties owed to Pegasus.”

The complaint seeks actual and punitive damages, as well as rescission of various agreements entered into by the NRTC and DirecTV, including their purported termination June 1 of their direct-broadcast satellite distribution agreement and, by extension, Pegasus’ member agreements with the NRTC.

The complaint also seeks the appointment of a receiver to administer the NRTC.

“As the lawsuit makes clear, we believe that the NRTC and its officers and directors have engaged in a pattern of improper conduct that violates Pegasus' contractual rights, that constitutes a breach of the NRTC's and its officers' and directors' fiduciary duties and that violates settled principles governing cooperative associations,” Pegasus president Ted Lodge said in a prepared statement.

“At the same time, DirecTV has conspired with and aided and abetted the NRTC in this effort and has breached its own duties to Pegasus,” he added. “We believe the defendants have engaged in these unlawful activities in order to steal our business and divide the spoils amongst themselves.”

NRTC CEO Bob Phillips called the suit "absurd and unfounded," adding, "Pegasus continues its campaign to blame others for its own business failures and poor decision making."

On June 10, a federal judge in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Portland, Maine, entered an order denying Pegasus’ request to prevent DirecTV from providing its DBS service directly to consumers in areas served by Pegasus Satellite Television.

On June 1, the NRTC announced that it no longer had the exclusive rights to distribute DirecTV’s DBS service in its territories, which terminated Pegasus’ exclusive agreements, as well.

And in April, a federal jury awarded DirecTV $51.5 million in damages from Pegasus regarding a lawsuit Pegasus filed claiming that DirecTV breached a joint marketing contract. Then in May, a federal district court judge granted DirecTV’s motions to eliminate all remaining claims against it by Pegasus and Golden Sky Systems Inc. in the parties’ four-year-old lawsuit.
 
yet another lawsuit, from Daily Variety:

Satellite lawsuits continue to fly. In the latest salvo, DirecTV has sued EchoStar. The industry leader slams its smaller rival for running "false and misleading" ads that claim customers of Pegasus Communications may lose their signals when Pegasus' contract with DirecTV ends.
 
I found a bunch of the legal documents. The latest denial was boring, just says the request is denied, one sentence with zero detail. The restraining order request was 5 parts: make NRTC give Pegasus exclusive rights to peg's territories, NRTC and directv wouldn't be allowed to implement "their purported termination" (love the phrasing) of their agreement, stop directv from soliciting, marketing or providing switching consent forms to peg customers, make nrtc and directv send peg customers to peg customer service, and stop directv putting out that annoying 'tune to channel 205' message.
 
oh cool, i can cut and paste the denial. The peg motions are scans converted to pdf. :P The hearing reference is from peg submitting a reply earlier that day and Judge Haines said in a hearing that he wasn't convinced and issued this denial. The arguments are kinda interesting reading, tho.


UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE

ORDER DENYING INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF​

For the reasons set forth on the record in the course of hearings conducted June 21, 2004, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order or, in the alternative, a preliminary injunction, is hereby DENIED.

DATED June 21, 2004 /s/ James B. Haines, Jr.
James B. Haines, Jr.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
 
Status
Please reply by conversation.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts

Top