From the 1/26/14 edition of the Philadelphia Inquirer:
"Comcast SportsNet has offered to go to arbitration with both of the satellite services with the hope that they will sign on soon to give Phillies fans the opportunity to tune in regardless of their service provider."
"When Comcast became a king of content as well as distribution by acquiring NBCUniversal, the FCC ordered program disputes to be settled via 'baseball-style arbitration,' an unusual process that makes an arbitrator pick one party's figure or the other's, no compromises allowed."
"So what is SportsNet worth? Like Comcast, the satellites won't discuss details, but it's clear that arbitration could put them at risk. SNL Kagan estimated in 2012 that Comcast's Washington SportsNet earned $4.02 per subscriber. Some reports say Comcast wants as much as $5 apiece for the Philadelphia version - near the high price tag for ESPN that leaves many of its counterparts complaining loudly about the exploding cost of TV sports."
How about arriving at a cost per subscriber FOR THOSE THAT WANT THE CHANNEL? Why can't it be a la carte, like HBO? Just thinking aloud....
"Comcast SportsNet has offered to go to arbitration with both of the satellite services with the hope that they will sign on soon to give Phillies fans the opportunity to tune in regardless of their service provider."
"When Comcast became a king of content as well as distribution by acquiring NBCUniversal, the FCC ordered program disputes to be settled via 'baseball-style arbitration,' an unusual process that makes an arbitrator pick one party's figure or the other's, no compromises allowed."
"So what is SportsNet worth? Like Comcast, the satellites won't discuss details, but it's clear that arbitration could put them at risk. SNL Kagan estimated in 2012 that Comcast's Washington SportsNet earned $4.02 per subscriber. Some reports say Comcast wants as much as $5 apiece for the Philadelphia version - near the high price tag for ESPN that leaves many of its counterparts complaining loudly about the exploding cost of TV sports."
How about arriving at a cost per subscriber FOR THOSE THAT WANT THE CHANNEL? Why can't it be a la carte, like HBO? Just thinking aloud....