Yeah, I saw it,,It says WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH Dish network unfair. They won't pay us what we want..Earlier this evening I saw a Court TV commercial on TBS that slammed Dish Network.
I agree...just wish the FCC and the "Industry" felt that way. While I am a sports enthusiast, there are millions of customers being forced to pay Big $$$ for the ESPN channels when they don't even watch sports. That's an even bigger rip-off in my opinion. While it may indeed be difficult to financially support the A la Carte model, I would love for programmers, cable and satellite providers to offer us more flexible choices...a combination of more programming packs, programming groups, and additional a la carte options. Again, why should someone pay for ESPN, ESPN2, ESPN Classic, ESPN News, Etc. when they don't even watch sports? Give customer more options to strip unwanted programming from their lineup. Personally, I would be willing to pay just as much, if not more, for the programming I want just to see the "fluff" channels disappear from the airwaves.
Do you watch Court Tv?..If so , do you watch enough that losing the channel would leave a significant "hole" in your tv viewing day?My question is, why would those of us with Top 60 (or HD Bronze) lose this channel? Why did Dish Network decide that the Top 60 tier should no longer include Court TV, especially since Court TV was willing to provide their programming at the same cost that Dish pays now? I could only see them moving it from Top 60 to Top 120 if Court TV wanted a large increase for keeping it in Top 60. But that's not the case here.
And why did Dish Network not inform their customers that they were planning to remove Court TV from the Top 60 tier? Does Dish Network have plans to remove other channels from Top 60 based on other negotiations? Exactly what will the new Top 100 comprise of in February if they are planning to remove basic networks like Court TV from the package?
Seems to me like Dish Network is the one to blame here. And once again, I (as a consumer), am being used as the pawn.
Robert
because VS is on the top tier..AT180 ..soon to be AT250..Ir9onically ,this channel is available a la carteVS. in AT60?.How come it only shows it in AT180?.
We are all pawns, because most of have little or no choice over the cable or sat providers we have to live with if we want more than standard TV.Court TV today;something else tomorrow. You have 2 Titanic egos here (Turner and Egren} who can't stand to lose or look bad. Its not really about the money and neither could care less about the subscribers.
He did ..The AOL/Time Warner merger was the beginning of the end for the sometimes eccentric Turner...An example of Turner's proensity to say things that leave on scratching their head..: "Men should be barred from public office for 100 years in every part of the world...The men have had millions of years where we've been running things. We've screwed it up hopelessly. Let's give it to the women"I thought Ted Turner sold out?
How about an update on whats happening with the two egomaniacs.Surely somebody has inside info on this needless dispute.I'd go to Direct or cable, but I have too much money tied up in equipment which works only with dish! Putting the Biography Channel on the Court TV channel is an absolute insult as it is already on its own channel!This is just UNcle Charlie's pathetic attempt to appease regular Court TV watchers like me.Many hate Court TV, but how would you feel if they dumped your favorite channel without warning? Yours could be next!
Anyone here upset about losing Court tv? I mean its not a bad channel i like it to watch cops, and other reality shows espically since they brought back the police chases and there all new. I was just wondering if anyone is upset about it?