DishSubLA The reasoning is that the computer makes so many calls, there should be no reason to call the customer and when a customer has a tech's number, it opens up the possibility of a, harassing the tech and b, something going on behind Dish's back. They need to know everything.
Now, from our perspective, if a tech can fix something without Dish knowing, he saves an R12/Trouble Call - which is a metric hit and believe me, Dish is never shy about opportunities to take money out of a tech's pocket.
Thank GOD I work for a Contractor/RSP and not Dish specifically, but we still have to abide by those stupid, stress-inducing metrics; CSAT Survey, R12/TC's, Completion Rate, Sales, Nest Sales, et al are constantly held over our heads.
My company urges us to call on the way to the job if for no other reason to establish communication,
in order to start working towards a perfect survey score!
Right. I can see now even more reasons for local retailers to have their techs leave a number to contact them--I am not saying it is correct nor proper--but a fact of life in these parts for years. As I've said before, you live in "nice" America, not the folks who can often be satellite retailers around here (I found ONE GOOD one, but he retired and sold his business to a CREEP)
FWIW, I agree: techs should not have to leave their number after an install, and likely violates a number of state labor laws, I have no doubt, but that is added on to the pile of other violations that companies make counter to US or state labor laws that go unreported or unknown to the government. The problem is, employees have to take it (leave their number in this case) because they will likely lose their jobs. I've both seen 1st hand and know of countless such situations. The last install I had for 2 H3's, the tech was quite upset having mumbled, "I don't get payed enough for this . . . " and then he left his number so I could call him if problems arise in the next few days in relation to being a NEW install--not a new customer.
Also it is also IRONIC that in some situations some employees can see "good" policies or "good" labor law as being counter-productive in their unique case because techs may even prefer to leave their number, anyway, but only because it allows them to fix and satisfy the customer FASTER, SOONER, and not have the tech or company he/she works for suffer negative financial consequences that could get them in the doghouse with an employer. Dish may "need" to know everything, but Dish may not "want" to know everything if it means keeping a subscriber due to local intervention regarding the install rather then LOSE the subscriber due to an off-shore CSR not "resolving" the problem or due to a lack of familiarity with the install or the personal rapport established between the installer and the new customer that the tech who did it can address much faster and with greater knowledge and more efficiency.
The point for the local retailers is to satisfy the customer in the most expeditious manner possible and KEEP the subscriber to avoid losing money, and the point for Dish is to KEEP the new subscriber with,
likely, any means at the local retailer's disposal that Dish does NOT want to know about.
I agreed with the court decisions against Nordstrom and its particular practice of "
personal customer service" it required of all sales employees. It was not right to have the work time invade on personal time--and at NO ADDITIONAL WAGES. And there a MANY such labor related transgressions by a number of well-known entities. It never ends!
So,I too, agree, that no techs should be required to leave their number. The company's number should be on paper-work, and then the company can get in contact with that particular tech. That sounds like the proper way to do things. All contact should be with the local retailer company. However, the reality, in almost any workplace, is a sad, sad example of the opposite. But who is willing to sacrifice their employment to do the right thing? Just about no one.
We see eye to eye on this one. We are in full agreement.