Conference Call Dish Network

With both D* and Fios expanding sub numbers significantly and with the loss of the AT&T agreement, I have a feeling E*'s sub numbers will be poor as they have been the last year.
fios would be eating D* not E* cus D* has a deal with Verizon
 
At this point most all providers are about the same overall. Most of the Telcos are spending allot of money just to get their stuff up and running..
 
Canabalizing D*s base. Aside from FiOS TV, Verizon has a Double/Triple/Quad Play partnership with DirecTV.

Yes, they've had an agreement like that for a while. I don't see how D* gets cannibalized. D* will get Verizon customers with the tie-in who don't have Fios available which is most of them. Stop to think about it. D* isn't going to enter an agreement with another company unless it expects to gain by doing so. When Fios enters a market, it picks up from the cablecos, D*, and E*, not just one provider. Now D* also has an agreement with AT&T. Is it going to be cannibalized by AT&T U-Verse now? If they are getting cannibalized they must be adding them faster by other means given their subscriber growth.
 
Verizon has a triple play bundle with D* For every fios going in more than likely 1 D* customer going away

Or an E* or cableco customer. You're ignoring the fact that most Verizon customers do not have access to Verizon Fios. D* is picking up subs from Verizon bundling in the nonFios areas or they wouldn't have an agreement. Same with the new AT&T agreement and U-verse. Why would D* enter into agreements that were adverse to them with not one but two very large telcos? Have densely populated areas since the advent of Fios and U-verse or even large bundling cablecos ever been prime subscriber territory for DBS?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts

Top