Is SV still governed by that 1976 list?
John I was wondering that myself, the SV list show WMTW in Portland Me as my SV channels and yet their transmitter was taken off Mount Washington,NH years ago. I suspect the list is outdated.
This list from the FCC is from 5/3/2010.
Stations with a plus sign (+) under individual counties are those
stations added to the list after the publication of the Commision’s original 1972 list
John I was wondering that myself, the SV list show WMTW in Portland Me as my SV channels and yet their transmitter was taken off Mount Washington,NH years ago. I suspect the list is outdated.
I'd like to believe that to be true, but I don't believe it is...Tower Guy said:Once a stations is on the SV list for a particular county it is never taken off the SV list for that county, even if it fails to maintain coverage in that county.
I'd like to believe that to be true, but I don't believe it is...
Read the fine print in the FCC rules. It's there somewhere. The cable co's are not required to carry SV stations.
according to the FCC's pdf it does cover your county still...but take them with a grain of salt
http://www.fcc.gov/dtv/markets/maps_current/Portland-Auburn_ME.pdf
page 10 of pdf
I'm with you N1. I live in southwest Arkansas about 100 miles form LIttle Rock, AR and about 100 miles from Shreveport, La. Obviously, OTA reception is impossible. DMA says Lousiana but I live in Arkansas and could care less about their news & sports. Also, I have a U.S. Congressman who lives 15 miles northwest of me who made a personal deal for his small hometown of about 5,000 to be able to view Shreveport and Little Rock locals but only with directv. (which is his provider when not in Washington DC.) So it's all political and nothing else. You can blame the FCC and Neilson but it's all a matter of who you are and who you know that matters and nothing else.
I've bitched about this for many years and still have to "move" if I ever want to watch my Arkansas locals. I can't afford to built a cable system tower and cable in this part of the country is nothing but a rip off. (but they do have both Little Rock & Shreveport locals though). Go figure!
but if you read closer the list is from 1972 mainly
Tower Guy said:Once a stations is on the SV list for a particular county it is never taken off the SV list for that county, even if it fails to maintain coverage in that county.
Greg Bimson said:I'd like to believe that to be true, but I don't believe it is...
Let me try this again, because there is a misunderstanding here. My parents, who I lived with in 1985 when we first had cable, received the Baltimore networks on their cable system in Prince George's County, Maryland. When they left PG County in 1998, those Baltimore stations were still on the cable system.Tower Guy said:Read the fine print in the FCC rules. It's there somewhere. The cable co's are not required to carry SV stations.
Well Ice I can tell you maps say 1 thing and reality is another. The transmitter for WMTW is in the Lake Sebago,ME area about 125 miles from me. WMTW used to to have a translator in Lebanon NH but sold it to NH Public TV a few years ago. I can tell you I could put best OTA antenna,preamp and rotor money could buy and still only get 2 or 3 channels. Like you said I take coverage maps with a grain of salt
Therefore, those stations had to have been on the signficantly-viewed list.
We should dispense with maps and DMA’s and all the accompanying nonsense like the illusion they’re protecting local advertisers because if they really cared about these advertisers, they would be paying re-transmitters to carry their signal, not the other way around. Subscribers should be able to view any local channel that’s available.
If I want to view all the NYC locals in HD, I should be able to purchase them. In summary, I should be able to view as many locals from around the country as my wallet can afford.
We should dispense with maps and DMA’s and all the accompanying nonsense like the illusion they’re protecting local advertisers because if they really cared about these advertisers, they would be paying re-transmitters to carry their signal, not the other way around. Subscribers should be able to view any local channel that’s available.
If I want to view all the NYC locals in HD, I should be able to purchase them. In summary, I should be able to view as many locals from around the country as my wallet can afford.