ummm verizon..cincinatti was never a baby bellYou but they bought back up a lot of their former bells, too. If I remember correctly the only one that is still independent is Cincinnati Bell
ummm verizon..cincinatti was never a baby bellYou but they bought back up a lot of their former bells, too. If I remember correctly the only one that is still independent is Cincinnati Bell
ummm verizon..cincinatti was never a baby bell
Att owned alot of stuff..they spun off what became the ABC radio network because they owned all the broadband lines that connected the radio and tv stations back in the day...so they used franchises to get around ownership limitsI guess you're right- they were a franchisee.
Regional Bell Operating Company - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I’d add Sony to that list of main holdouts.
I mean... the only way I would personally think this might be acceptable is if Comcast agrees to continue to distribute all apps and programming that they give to Roku, to any other device / operating system, on equitable terms. No "special backroom deals"
Doesn't Comcast already have the programming, distribution, electronics on the cable side?No way! That would mean Comcast would have the programming, the distribution of programming, and the electronics for receiving programming. I'm quite certain this will be stopped by a FTC that is well footed in the 21st centu...
...oh wait...
...we're screwed. Any deal that would be a "compromise" would take away the reason for buying Roku in the first place.
there are better streamers available
Roku is my favorite..I have " upgraded" several times when software upgrades cameout that crippled the boxOpinions vary.
Yes, which is a problem, but this makes the problem even more egregious.Doesn't Comcast already have the programming, distribution, electronics on the cable side?
You can use your android or iphone to get around that...the roku is compatible with both for screens sharingWhat do you bet the current "dispute" between Roku and YouTube TV isn't back room dealing already in the works. Roku is telling Comcast, look we will make it easy to eliminate your strongest competitor coming in the door.
Face it, the largest shareholders will make a fortune. This is the end game when starting a company. The final payoff.
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
Comcast already has a app on the Roku, you no longer need a STB if you have xfinity tv service, been that way for a few years.ROKU was invented to provide a way to stream netflix. Comcast wants to replace expensive set top boxes with a app in a customer owned ROKU..there are better streamers available ..Comcast would not bevcreating a monopy by buying ROKU..justcsaving money