Wait till the streaming gets bad enough providers refuse to carry ESPN. It will eventually put them out of business
Yes, maybe 1 event a year at most, I watch ESPN it's so memorable that I don't even remember the event? I think they should sell ESPN separately. Not worth $1.00 a month, imo.
Yes. I live in the Mobile-Pensacola area and CBS WKRG has been running a ticker saying COX cable is going to go black as of 1 January. Luckily I have Dish.And here's another dispute warning between Tribune Media and Charter/Spectrum. Maybe the other distributors are finally starting to say enough is enough like Charlie's been saying for years.
Warning Issued About Looming Deadline in Carriage Dispute | TVWeek
Also saw on one of the bowl games I was watching that the ACC is coming out with their own network next year.ESPN has locked up almost all of the college bowl games, which has cost them a lot of money, so they have to demand more money to pay for all their sports broadcast. I hope they go bankrupt. Stop watching ESPN.
Also saw on one of the bowl games I was watching that the ACC is coming out with their own network next year.
To all that do not want it. Dish does offer the flex package and you do not have to add ESPN to it
We can stop watching ESPN, but we'll be paying for it nonetheless. As Claude said, if they're not in the base package, they're out of business.ESPN has locked up almost all of the college bowl games, which has cost them a lot of money, so they have to demand more money to pay for all their sports broadcast. I hope they go bankrupt. Stop watching ESPN.
Anyone have any recent ESPN viewership numbers, that may justify their price? Obviously it has to be great enough that it has not been removed from anyone yet.
Actually, ESPN is SINKING Disney's stock and has become a financial burden for Disney. ESPN is not the Golden Goose it once was. Please research on the internet about this. ESPN is Bob Iger's bane and living hell. Fortunately, for dear Bob, the recent acquisition of most of Fox has been greatly positive news and assures them of not having ESPN's significant drop in value and INCOME completely blow up in Disney's face. Yeah, I know a LOT of sports fans who no longer need ESPN all that much, but for the really big games, and certainly not for scores and news and info.It must not be outdated if they can charge over $8 for it. I only watch Monday Night Football on it, but I know people who live on that channel.
Actually, its the Regional Sports channels that have the fewer viewer and are still expensive. Charlie has stated publicly many times "someone is gonna go without Regionals . . . we were prepared to do it, but came to a [decent] deal." For now, losing ESPN would be too much of a loss/hit, but I can see more Regionals being dropped by Dish, perhaps one by one or two or three by three. No doubt, come in a few years when retransmission deals expire, someone may actually drop ESPN, at least for a short period. It will be an interesting thing to see.I think the numbers are inflated and it’s a game of chicken.
Which provider pulls ESPN first.
I can see Charlie pulling it and nobody giving a dam.
Directv has got a little bigger problem as it’s needed for commercial accounts.
Oh, yes, the same mess is being re-created with the streaming VirtualMVPD's. It's already back to "packages" and at the current prices, not a one of the VMVPD's is making any money, yet. But the world changes much faster than it used to, so the VMVPD may never get to a point when they can make a profit, especially with the content owners finally deciding they want their own streaming service for their own content, and Bob Iger's Disney/Fox model streaming service is gonna set the standard for all of us having to pay each studio's streaming service to watch anything. I think Netflix will be one of those stories of a company so HIGH and valuable, only to be near death in some 3-4 years, and their Original content AINT gonna help Netflix all that much (that OLD TV show Friends is one of Netflix's most popular offerings), especially as EXPENSIVE that original contents costs to produce.Wait till the streaming gets bad enough providers refuse to carry ESPN. It will eventually put them out of business
Actually, its the Regional Sports channels that have the fewer viewer and are still expensive. Charlie has stated publicly many times "someone is gonna go without Regionals . . . we were prepared to do it, but came to a [decent] deal." For now, losing ESPN would be too much of a loss/hit, but I can see more Regionals being dropped by Dish, perhaps one by one or two or three by three. No doubt, come in a few years when retransmission deals expire, someone may actually drop ESPN, at least for a short period. It will be an interesting thing to see.
The only thing I don't like about MLB. TV is they show too many Yankees and Red Sox games.(at least in my area, Mobile-Pensacola).There are a lot of compromises I'm willing to make when it comes to TV, but losing my RSN is not one of them. I have to be able to watch my Cardinals games. If Dish flushes FSM, I'll just get MLB.tv
I like it better anyway.
The only thing I don't like about MLB. TV is they show too many Yankees and Red Sox games.(at least in my area, Mobile-Pensacola).
Ok my bad.I believe you're thinking of MLB Network. I'm reffering to MLB.tv the streaming service. It lets you view all the games of the team you prefer.