Oddly enough, the same thing I wear now. Jeans, T-shirts, and sneakers. Classics never go out of style. My hair's a little different now, though. But, that was not my choice.So what were you wearing back in the 70'-80's?
Oddly enough, the same thing I wear now. Jeans, T-shirts, and sneakers. Classics never go out of style. My hair's a little different now, though. But, that was not my choice.So what were you wearing back in the 70'-80's?
I find it's mostly 20 and 30-something idiots with iphones, wearing stupid hats and footwear who make these statements. They are the same people who seem to think watching TV and movies on phones and tablets is better than on a 65" plasma. Idiots.
I totally agree with you. My family watch a lot of streaming, but we also watch discs, both dvd and bd. Let's be honest, it's the content owners who want this a lot more than the consumers. Total control of the product, while getting you to pay $20+ for it is utopia for them.The fact is that DVD/BD discs will die, and be replaced by streaming. That is a given.
But, I hate it when people talk about it as if it's dead now. It is not. It has a few years left due to the huge user base.
While I sure as hell don't watch content on a cell phone, tablets and laptops aren't that bad. You have to remember when you were young. How often were you at the same place for a long-time? When always on the move or you share an apartment or dorm room, everyone wants to watch their own stuff. One large tv in the living room doesn't meet that requirement. Different lifestyles have different needs.I find it's mostly 20 and 30-something idiots with iphones, wearing stupid hats and footwear who make these statements. They are the same people who seem to think watching TV and movies on phones and tablets is better than on a 65" plasma. Idiots.
When I was young, I lusted after a big TV. Of course, a big TV was 25". But, a 25" color TV sure was a step up from my 19" B&W. Later, when my parents got a 17" Trinitron, which was Sony's largest screen, at the time, I still longed for a 25", even if the picture on a 3-gun CRT didn't equal that of the revolutionary Trinitron single-gun tube. (Bit of irony - The Trinitron tube was invented by RCA. But, they didn't think it was economical to pursue, so they sold the rights to Sony. RCA went on to die, while Sony became huge.)You have to remember when you were young. How often were you at the same place for a long-time? When always on the move or you share an apartment or dorm room, everyone wants to watch their own stuff. One large tv in the living room doesn't meet that requirement. Different lifestyles have different needs.
Stupid is stupid, regardless of age. Your posts prove that fact on a daily basis.tell us how you really feel.......folks back in 1920 probably felt the same way about you......just a different generation...
oh and btw.....it's an Eminence Front, it's a put on...
When I was young, I lusted after a big TV. Of course, a big TV was 25". But, a 25" color TV sure was a step up from my 19" B&W. Later, when my parents got a 17" Trinitron, which was Sony's largest screen, at the time, I still longed for a 25", even if the picture on a 3-gun CRT didn't equal that of the revolutionary Trinitron single-gun tube. (Bit of irony - The Trinitron tube was invented by RCA. But, they didn't think it was economical to pursue, so they sold the rights to Sony. RCA went on to die, while Sony became huge.)
That is incorrect. Sony did indeed take over the development of the Chromatron tube (a project heavily funded by Paramount Pictures and with no ties to RCA) but eventually abandoned it due to economic and reliability issues. There had been erroneous statements than Trinitron and Chromatron were essentially the same...all false. Trinitron was finally developed entirely by Sony and began production in the late 60's. The real irony is they were one of the last entrants into the Color TV business...and quickly went on to dominate it, pre-HDTV.(Bit of irony - The Trinitron tube was invented by RCA. But, they didn't think it was economical to pursue, so they sold the rights to Sony. RCA went on to die, while Sony became huge.)
The fact is that DVD/BD discs will die, and be replaced by streaming. That is a given.
But, I hate it when people talk about it as if it's dead now. It is not. It has a few years left due to the huge user base.
I find it's mostly 20 and 30-something idiots with iphones, wearing stupid hats and footwear who make these statements. They are the same people who seem to think watching TV and movies on phones and tablets is better than on a 65" plasma. Idiots.
I doubt Dish gets rid of the package. It has been around in one form or another long before Dish bought Blockbuster. Maybe if the disc portion goes away, Dish will reduce the package price?So I assume eventually the entire Blockbuster thing will disappear and I will get that $10 a month chopped off my bill?
Stupid is stupid, regardless of age. Your posts prove that fact on a daily basis.
But, quoting Pete Townsend gives you points, even if it's not really applicable.
The fact is that DVD/BD discs will die, and be replaced by streaming. That is a given.
But, I hate it when people talk about it as if it's dead now. It is not. It has a few years left due to the huge user base.
I find it's mostly 20 and 30-something idiots with iphones, wearing stupid hats and footwear who make these statements. They are the same people who seem to think watching TV and movies on phones and tablets is better than on a 65" plasma. Idiots.
Real good headphones may give you better sound but not nearly better enough.
Because he is the head of the single worst company in entire nation to work for.