I'm watching KCAL now and the warning about losing the channels is running every ten minutes or so.
Per B&C tweet new extension has been reached to next week.
They also have the Big Bang Theory which is the # 1 rated sitcom on tv also.Tells me they can't be that far apart, and neither wants the headache of having CBS channels off of DISH. Dropping a non watched channel like CNN and the others from Turner that were dropped is one thing, but CBS really is the most watched network channel. Rarely would I say this but unless prone to set up an antenna or already have one, I can see people scrambling to switch if they can't watch NCIS. To put it in perspective, CBS has just a little less viewers than DISH has subscribers. (Almost 11 million viewers) There are few battles DISH can win but then lose the war and in the long run, this is one of them.
Most shows are now on a "winter break", since November Sweeps have ended. My guess is they extended through last week to finish sweeps, and extended through this week to get through Thanksgiving Football. After that, they may be more likely to allow the channels to go dark.They also have the Big Bang Theory which is the # 1 rated sitcom on tv also.
Its NFL on turkey day that is important..charlie could careless for anything elseTells me they can't be that far apart, and neither wants the headache of having CBS channels off of DISH. Dropping a non watched channel like CNN and the others from Turner that were dropped is one thing, but CBS really is the most watched network channel. Rarely would I say this but unless prone to set up an antenna or already have one, I can see people scrambling to switch if they can't watch NCIS. To put it in perspective, CBS has just a little less viewers than DISH has subscribers. (Almost 11 million viewers) There are few battles DISH can win but then lose the war and in the long run, this is one of them.
because after the digital transition a low cost indoor antenna will not work for most despite what the misinformed antenna experts on this forum thinkWhy would an OTA net want to pick a fight with a satellite or cable provider when a viewer simply needs to invest in a low-cost antenna for programming?
Because 80-90% of viewers do NOT (will not ?) do it.Why would an OTA net want to pick a fight with a satellite or cable provider when a viewer simply needs to invest in a low-cost antenna for programming?
http://www.ce.org/News/News-Releases/Press-Releases/2014/OTA-Study_060514.aspxAccording to a new study from the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA)®, The Market for U.S. Household Television Services, the percentage of U.S. households with a television that relies exclusively on an antenna for television programming reception (six percent) is about to be eclipsed for the first time ever by the percentage of households relying only on the Internet for TV programming (five percent).
BS. A $30 indoor antenna is all that is needed in most metro and suburban areas..anywhere within 30 miles of a transmission tower. Is it as "maintenance free" as a cable/satellite hook up? Maybe not. One may have to adjust the antenna to receive one channel or another. But if I can receive channels from two markets (Over two dozen channel with sub-channels) with a $30 powered indoor antenna without even aiming it at anything in a tree-filled, hilly area with low HAAT antenna placement, I know it is not difficult to receive digital TV signals.because after the digital transition a low cost indoor antenna will not work for most despite what the misinformed antenna experts on this forum think
Not in NYC..but NYC metro extends into Pennsylvania.. LA is huge too..I mean NYC viewing area not NYCBS. A $30 indoor antenna is all that is needed in most metro and suburban areas..anywhere within 30 miles of a transmission tower. Is it as "maintenance free" as a cable/satellite hook up? Maybe not. One may have to adjust the antenna to receive one channel or another. But if I can receive channels from two markets (Over two dozen channel with sub-channels) with a $30 powered indoor antenna without even aiming it at anything in a tree-filled, hilly area with low HAAT antenna placement, I know it is not difficult to receive digital TV signals.
What many fail to recognize, or even deny, is that what used to translate to ghost images on analog channels (multi-path) will kill the picture and sound on the digital signal. Actually LOWERING the antenna rabbit ears, or turning the UHF loop away from the station will improve reception because it cuts down on multipath issues.
What is a digital antenna ?And is a digital antenna