Okay, I understand your alacarte argument, and it is clearly a strong one. But the NFL network comparison specious? Are you honestly suggesting that in the Big Ten region, that a network that covers 2/3s of conference basketball games LIVE will not be more popular than a network that has only 8 live regular season sporting events a year? Outside of the region, yes, the NFL network will probably be more popular, but the pricing would reflect that (60 cents or so a customer difference).
I think that most of us want alacarte pricing (Hall's exception noted,
). I am entirely willing to pay extra for my sports programming (I have purchased Gameplan for years to accomplish just that). I wish that the BTN would agree to put it on a sports tier. But it is also not "fair" that I have to pay for all of the channels that sports fans get forced on us as well. You want to draw the line here with the BTN, and that's fine. But then let's push our legislators to get rid of tier programming altogether, so that I don't have to continue to pay for all of the childrens programming that never gets watched in my household either.