Following examples set by D* don't seem like a good idea.... I've read that based on the # of NFL-ST ticket customers vs what D* paid for the rights, they either lose money per NFL-ST customer or *all* of their customers make up the difference.
once again a local sports channel debate...I guess if the money is right and E* wants to negotiate for the service it may be offered in the midwest as a regional or a premium sports net.......It's not a channel with national interest and I don't think the rest of us want to subsidize it..But if people in OH,MI,WI,IA and IN want it they can lobby for it....Good luck!I know it is a little early yet to ask since this channel is not set for release until August,but any word if there will be an interest on E*`s part to carry. If not will give plenty of time to campaign for it. {Check out below listed links for more info}
http://www.bigtennetwork.com/bigtennetwork
Big Ten Network - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the rub..Those not interested in this programming will be forced to subsidize this new service. I have no objection to E* picking up the Big Ten net, but make it a premium channel. In the post above there is mention of people willing to pay for it.The thing is they aren't paying for it..Everyone subscribing to E* would help cover the cost.now this is interesting from the president of Big 10 network who was in Champaign yesterday:
Big Ten Network
Big Ten Network
Reported by: Sarah Jindra / WCIA 3 NEWS
04/11/2007 05:27pm
The President of the Big Ten Network stopped in Champaign Wednesday, to talk about the network's progress. Originally, only fans with Direct-TV were going to get the network, but now, President Mark Silverman says those with dish and cable will also see the action.
Currently, it only has a contract with Direct-TV, but Silverman says he's confident the others will pick up the network before it kicks off in August. Some cable providers say they're not so sure that's going to happen. But fans are hoping..they'll have their Illini.
When the television in Rob Gorham's house is on, it's usually on sports. That's why he was upset when he heard only customers with Direct-TV would get the Big Ten Network. "It was a bummer, it was terrible," says Gorham.
But now, there's hope for fans like Gorham. The president of the Big Ten Network expects cable companies and the Dish Network to sign on soon. And he says you won't have to pay extra for it. "There will be no additional cost to the consumer. It will be part of the cable package they're currently paying for," says Silverman.
But small cable companies that serve rural areas wonder how that's possible. The GM of Clearvision, in Greenup, says their customers may be out of luck when it comes to watching Illini sports. He says the network hasn't even contacted him yet. And he worries, if his company pays to get the network, he'll need re-coup the money somehow.
But the network still says it thinks everyone will eventually be on board. Silverman says, "I do not see an instance where a distributor will not enable those viewers access to a channel we're making widely available to everybody."
Even larger cable companies, like Insight, are still questioning whether to purchase the network. It is in negotiations right now, but it too, says the cost is a concern.
But fans like Gorham say, they'd be willing to pay to get their Illini. Gorham says, "go get the contract, sign the contract, your customers want the Big Ten Network." However, it's a different story for those that aren't sports fans. They say any added cost, just wouldn't be worth it. It leaves cable companies and the Dish Network, trying to decide if they should invest with the Big Ten.
Sounds like a good idea.
Let Dish pick it up and pay the $1.10 per subscriber, but make it a $5 premuim channel.
I don't want to pay for your fanatacism, but I'll pay for my own.
once again a local sports channel debate...I guess if the money is right and E* wants to negotiate for the service it may be offered in the midwest as a regional or a premium sports net.......It's not a channel with national interest and I don't think the rest of us want to subsidize it..But if people in OH,MI,WI,IA and IN want it they can lobby for it....Good luck!
Hmmm..what do you think the word "fan" applies to when describing a follower of a sports team?Fanatacism? Hardly that .... oops! I guess you were trying to be funny! :clap :clap
We could go around and around all day with the, "I don't watch it so I don't want to pay for it," argument but that would apply to every channel wouldn't it? That just takes us back to the age old a la carte debate. Dish has stated several times they would like to offer everything a la carte but the networks won't allow it.
I said earlier in the thread that I would like Dish to offer this channel one way or another (regional, sportspack, whatever) but if the BTN is going to be bullheaded and demand that they be carried on a basic tier I sincerely think there is enough interest for that.
All of the above being said we may just be wasting our time debating it given E*'s track record. If E* has demonstrated anything it's that they will NOT overpay for ANY channel at launch. As sure as the sun rises and sets every day E* will scoff at $1.10 per subscriber.
A lot of cable companies that have signed put it on the expanded basic, basically the AT200 level comparison.
I couldn't agree more with this, since the argument comes up every time a new sports channel is mentioned. If you don't want to pay for my sports channels, then let me pick through my non-sports channels to let you know which ones of those I don't want to pay for. It works both ways.We could go around and around all day with the, "I don't watch it so I don't want to pay for it," argument but that would apply to every channel wouldn't it?
What about the NCAA Football package?....I would think if one wanted their College football fix badly enough they would pay the fee for the package...I agree everyone should not have to pay for it, but put it in America's Everything Pak or the Sports pak. Even if the sports pak goes up a dollar it would be fine with me, but Dish needs to get it and the mountain. There is just too much college football that dish does not allow access to.
this is why I am an advocate of a la carte...Of course a la carte would kill any possibilty of channels like Big 10 from ever getting on a satellite line up...BTW I am a sports fan..But not so spun up about college football...The NFL is my fix...Actually it doesn't work both ways...Like it or not services like A&E ,Discovery, TBS, etc have much higher ratings and thus serve a much larger audience than the sports nets and other niche sports programming..now when you talk about other niche channels, these ar ethe chs that add to our monthly bills and take up valuable space on the guide.I couldn't agree more with this, since the argument comes up every time a new sports channel is mentioned. If you don't want to pay for my sports channels, then let me pick through my non-sports channels to let you know which ones of those I don't want to pay for. It works both ways.