I don't recall discussing price gouging. It is supply and demand pricing. The bandwidth is limited and with the build, maintenance and replacement schedules, the cost is high. Is 15k per month really that expensive to put you 24/7 channel in front of 5-7 (potential 50+) million viewers in North and Central America? Every additional satellite viewer decreases the per viewer cost, but with IP delivery, every viewer costs more!
Satellite distribution is economical if overcoming geographic obstacles or supporting a large number of downlinks with "broadcast" experience or local insertion type programming. Providing a local experience is very expensive.
Satellite distribution remains economical and viable for most broadcasters. I don't see this delivery method becoming obsolete any time in the foreseeable future.
This departure has little to do with the economics of satellite bandwidth cost. It is about matching technology to the needs of the broadcaster's distribution scale and requirements for content security.
Boycott fiber? Serious? We all want giga connections for our Netflix and YouTube puppy videos, but whine and cry when the technology disrupts other distribution models.
A major shift occurred when fire was created by man, but to this day we still enjoy salads, fresh fruits and sushi...