Then I guess the ratings must be good in countries outside the U.S. Bell TV, Shaw Direct, Rogers, and virtually every cable company in Canada carries BBC World News. I guess there's more demand for it up there.
Then I guess the ratings must be good in countries outside the U.S. Bell TV, Shaw Direct, Rogers, and virtually every cable company in Canada carries BBC World News. I guess there's more demand for it up there.
Exactly, the close relationship with Britain makes Canadians apt to watch BBC World News.Of course Canada has a much closer association with Great Britain than the USA does...
The following concept is false:I think we'll see donkeys fly before E* (& D* as well) ever add BBC World News & CNN International. It's beyond me why every cable and satellite company OUTSIDE THE U.S. has these channels but virtually no one in the U.S. carries them. Absolutely crazy!! Do they think that the only people who care about what's going on outside this country are those who speak a foreign language?
Did the BBC News or CNN International have one story about the housing bubble, about sub-prime mortgages, about credit default swaps, in 2006 ? No. In 2007 even ? No.
But there is more in-depth coverage about international economic news, issues between Russia and Georgia, the situation in Iran, the coup in Honduras, the political crisis in Japan, Chinese ethnic problems (need I go on?). Try to find much of that on CNN-Domestic, MSNBC, or FAUX News. Good luck!
Also, give your remote a workout and see if lack of popularity really limits carriage of a channel.
I can guarantee you that the only factors taken into account regarding carriage of a channel are:Also, give your remote a workout and see if lack of popularity really limits carriage of a channel.
Actually, there has been more coverage of Iran on CNN than on BBC World, mainly because the latter is only 25 minutes long, and CNN often devotes a full hour to certain issues, such as Iran (note that is not in Prime Time, if you want news from CNN, you need to record the 4pm-6pm ET slot).But there is more in-depth coverage about international economic news, issues between Russia and Georgia, the situation in Iran, the coup in Honduras, the political crisis in Japan, Chinese ethnic problems (need I go on?). Try to find much of that on CNN-Domestic, MSNBC, or FAUX News. Good luck!.
Exactly, the close relationship with Britain makes Canadians apt to watch BBC World News.
Equally a close relationship with U.S. has them watching regular CNN instead of CNN International.
It also helps that they don't have a really strong domestic news channels the way we have CNN/Fox/MSNBC.
They're okay, but they don't dominate the way that CNN and BBC do.I think CTV News Channel & CBC Newsworld are pretty good!
I can guarantee you that the only factors taken into account regarding carriage of a channel are:
- Popularity
- Cost
- Requirements (i.e. requiring the channel to be in a certain package)
If BBC World or CNN-International were free to broadcast, like NASA or C-SPAN, they would be on Dish Network and DirecTV.
The fact that they are on neither should be a clue that the problem does not lie with Dish or DirecTV.
Actually, there has been more coverage of Iran on CNN than on BBC World, mainly because the latter is only 25 minutes long, and CNN often devotes a full hour to certain issues, such as Iran (note that is not in Prime Time, if you want news from CNN, you need to record the 4pm-6pm ET slot).
But you dodged my point, and you are continuing to follow certain news items because news channels say they are important.
That's rather condescending. I follow news stories because I think they're important. Those stations cater to the desire for important news. I have travelled oversees many times. I can make judgments about what is important. Other viewers also. Give us a little credit Mr. kstuart.
You cannot make a judgment if you do not get the information in the first place.
6 Billion people are living 24 hours a day, so they are doing 144 Billion Hours of actions every day.
So, what you get on all of the media (including all other countries) is a tiny fraction of what human beings are doing.
You appear not to have read my longer post which disproves the concept that "those stations cater to the desire for important news"...
Dish offers EuroNews on ch 900, ala carte for $1.99 a month, I had it when I had Cablevision back in the day and subscribe to it now. It's a great channel, it's done in a news/magazine format, there are no "talking heads" reading teleprompters and covers everything European from up to the minute news, weather, sports, finances, entertainment, etc. I actually prefer it over BBC World News and I'm happy (and surprised) Dish offers it, however it should be offered in one of their packages instead of having to subscribe to it ala carte.
"this thread duplicates 2058320 previous ones on the subject"
Thus backing up the view that there have not yet been enough to convince DISH.
They could offer an international news package with CNN-I, BBC-W, CBC, Deutsche Welle, and Radio France International's English TV news service.