GaryPen said:
I am "somewhat" happy, as well, in regard to OTA reception, which is what this poll was about.
I am more than "somewhat" UNhappy when it comes to the "acquiring signal", "downloading guide", "OTA channel recall", "loss of dark area detail", and "intermittant closed caption" defects.
I'm not sure why you continue to argue with me, as you appear to agree with Simon's and my assesment that Dish releases their products well before they are ready. Then, attempts to correct and play catch up for months to years after release, using its customers as involuntary beta testers. You know it is wrong. Period. No argument is necessary or justified.
Now, let's shake hands, have a beer, and make fun of middle managers, directors, and corporate VP's, like any good cubicle dweller.
I actually fell in the Happy choice.
I got better reception than with my 6000 under the same circumstances.
As to the other defects you mention, the only one that I am concerned about is the Loss of detail in the shadow area. I hope they can fix this without a hardware change. The others I don't use the feature or I consider them annoyance level. Don't run into them enough to cause me a lot of customer pain, but I am using my 811 on a daily basis. If I recall, you are using it off and on so that might be leading into more updating guide related experiences. I only see updating guide when I run into acquiring signal and that is about 1 ever two weeks.
As for continueing to argue with you. Well I don't see it as arguing, but calling you on your point. I felt you were overstating it and I felt the need to provide my perspective.
As for Dish's software practices, I understand your point and your position. However, mine is a bit different. There is always a balance of release vs. product stability. I don't mind getting a product sooner with some defects, but I think Dish releases it too soon. I think you are of the position that the product should not be released until it their is confidence in a near-perfect Out of Box experience. If you want near-perfect Out of Box experience from Dish, the release cycle will be much longer. This feeds back into the discussion of "Should Dish pre-announce products", but I will keep that out of this discussion to minimize rat holeing.
What I think Dish should do to improve their software quality is the following:
1) Read these boards relegiously. We provide a great source of information from the field. Make contact with people on here that seem to have a pulse on a particular product and work with them to improve the product.
2) Release a list of fixes with each revision to these forums so that we can see what is fixed and what is going to be fixed. That way we can feed back if it was and add any issues that Dish might not be aware off.
3) Expand their Beta program to people on these forums so that we can official be part of the process of fixing the issue.
4) Do a much better early cycle test program to catch the glaring bugs that they let out. This is my biggest area of gripe. Though the recall channel bug I consider minor, it should not have reached the field. Easy one to catch and very well defined.
Ok ... I ratholed. Damn.. :shocked
I apologize if I came across as arguing. This was not my intention. I was attempting to provide my perspective. I do disagree at your stated level of of near-perfect consumer products, but that is based on my perspective and experience. I also find it hard to believe your orginal assertion on your near-perfect experience with other consumer level products. That is why I orginally offered a counter-point. On a final point of your no argument is justified statment. Well I personally try to keep an open mind and try to understand the other person's perspective and point of view. I might disagree with it, but I would never state that my position is right and no argument can justify the other position.
In the case of Dish's software quality in regards to the 811 release, I think they were too lose with the release criteria but I actually understand their motivation. My guess is that the release criteria was, "Is it a step forward on the 6000?". Well I could see how the answer came back was "Yes" and that is why they released it. What they missed in my Opinion
1) Not enough relaibility information.
2) Not enough field testing (Beta).
3) Underestimated amount of people that would actually use the svideo/composite.
4) Underestimated the desire for a number of features they deleyed.
Ok ... I ratholed again. Damn.. Damn... :shocked
Well, No problem shaking your hand, however I don't drink. I will have an non-alcholic beer thought!
Nothing wrong with disagreeing. I don't think we are that far in our thinking, but I also think I do have a different understanding of the process that differs from you and that is why I posted.
Cheers!!