Is there a list for receivers that don't do 8PSK?
anything other than these won't work 311/311k/322/512/522/625/ VIP and Hoppers
Is there a list for receivers that don't do 8PSK?
Good Lord, that was never in doubt!Good, so I can keep my 722.
Well, I'm not around that much anymore and therefore not that up to speed. I have a receiver that is very old now and wasn't that sure about it.Good Lord, that was never in doubt!
She'll be more worried about the additional money to get one.Treat your wife. She deserves it! Hopper really is much better.
I have used both, the 722 was a good receiver, once you use the Hopper though, I wouldn't see many going back. If you have 722 series and are happy though, I wouldn't see a reason to switch.I still don't think it's worth the cost increase over a 722 unless you have a family watching and need more tuners and joeys.
Edit: maybe if Dish got off their a$$ and provided guide data for all locals and subchannels with the OTA module, but its too hot for you know what to freeze over so I don't see that happening. Plus my opinion is there's not enough content worth paying for as it is on subscription TV.
Locals will probably be the last thing they convert to 8PSK.Will the local channels on the spotbeams on 110 and 119 also be converted to 8PSK? Or is this conversion only for national channels?
I know it would have pissed off a lot of the laggards that haven't taken advantage of the swap out and still have QPSK only equipment (although there shouldn't be very many), but to get everybody to change out ASAP, you'd have thought they would have did locals first.Locals will probably be the last thing they convert to 8PSK.
They could use the space for subchannels,but they won't.Locals really do not need to be converted to 8PSK. They are on spot beams, so when your locals are converted, space is not freed up for more national channels.
Now it could be possible for Dish to improve the picture quality by allocating more bandwidth to the locals with the switch to 8PSK, so you might get a better picture.
The other issue is what equipment is needed at the uplink center for the conversion. Dish might not want to spend the money to convert locals if it costs a lot.
They could use the space for subchannels,but they won't.
Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk
While I understand all of this I worry about the older generation who just want TV. I cannot recall one piece of mail, one commercial or any email or update indicating Dish was making these changes. And the comment " well Dish has or is informing everyone" is patently false.So basically, the niche channels will be converted first, then the more popular ones. I know Dish is trying to give customers multiple warnings about this, but otoh, customers have had over a year to make the upgrades. If Dish still has to deal with a lot of phone calls about this, then I guess Dish does have a lot of uninformed and/or stubborn customers.