Forgive me if this has been discussed to death, but I must plead the New Guy Defense. We recently took advantage of the $49 upgrade offer and replaced our Dish 510 with a 625. Not being of the technical sort (I think I'm slowly getting there, though, reading these threads), I was just wondering what the fundamental differences are between the 510 and 625?
I am happy with the 625 - it's been about a month now - but I find it to be more unstable than the 510, mostly on playback. The 625's audio drops are not that frequent, but compared to having none with the 510 I find this very annoying. Also the picture glitches - "artifacts" I think they're called - are also very irritating given that the 510 on playback had none. These are just two of the more prominent examples of what I believe are software problems and not hardware problems. But why would a newer, "more advanced" machine not be at least as stable as an older one? Does the 625 run on a whole different platform or architecture?
That said, I'll be keeping the 625 given I'm a TV addict and I want the dual-tuner capabilities the 510 did not have. I'm also not interested in switching to HD anytime soon even though the E* SD picture quality ranges anywhere between horrific and okay on my JVC 32" CRT (Maybe I've just gotten so used to looking for the bad in the PQ that I now fixate on it). I was just wondering if anyone could explain in simple terms why the 625 just feels a little bit to me like a step down from the 510?
Thanks for reading.
I am happy with the 625 - it's been about a month now - but I find it to be more unstable than the 510, mostly on playback. The 625's audio drops are not that frequent, but compared to having none with the 510 I find this very annoying. Also the picture glitches - "artifacts" I think they're called - are also very irritating given that the 510 on playback had none. These are just two of the more prominent examples of what I believe are software problems and not hardware problems. But why would a newer, "more advanced" machine not be at least as stable as an older one? Does the 625 run on a whole different platform or architecture?
That said, I'll be keeping the 625 given I'm a TV addict and I want the dual-tuner capabilities the 510 did not have. I'm also not interested in switching to HD anytime soon even though the E* SD picture quality ranges anywhere between horrific and okay on my JVC 32" CRT (Maybe I've just gotten so used to looking for the bad in the PQ that I now fixate on it). I was just wondering if anyone could explain in simple terms why the 625 just feels a little bit to me like a step down from the 510?
Thanks for reading.