2014 Stanley Cup Playoffs
- Thread starter BillD1984
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 819
- Views 43K
If you believe that the Kings committed goalie interference,then the Rangers should have won this game rather than go into overtime. They still have a chance to win,but the third goal by the Kings will be hotly debated if the Kings do pull out a win in OT.
Well, we saw what the Penguins and Bruins did overcoming 2-0 series deficits in the SCF.
The way NY played at times... if they got blown out, I'd be worried.
But after I (and Bill) saw Boston drop 2 heartbreakers to start the 2011 Finals in Vancouver, and how they responded, I'm gonna wait until game 3 to see if this series will be a series or if it may be over early.
The way NY played at times... if they got blown out, I'd be worried.
But after I (and Bill) saw Boston drop 2 heartbreakers to start the 2011 Finals in Vancouver, and how they responded, I'm gonna wait until game 3 to see if this series will be a series or if it may be over early.
There's one HUGE difference: that Canucks team and this Kings team are polar opposites in the intestinal fortitude dept. (especially in the net)!!
If the Rangers don't start scoring right out of the gate,they're pretty much doomed,because I think the Kings are to strong for them to go toe to toe with. If they had called goalie interference on the Kings' third goal in game 2,the series would be tied 1-1,but as it stands,if the Rangers don't wake up,it looks like a sweep for the Kings.
Come on Rangers,if you're going to play with an empty net,then get out of the end where the empty net is.
Well, given that we've had only 2 Cup Finals that didn't go 6 games since 1999, guess it couldn't last forever.
Congrats to the Rangers tonight. I hope they win in LA Friday so this can at least go 6 games. I want LA to win,but I want a series also.
Kings were 2 INCHES from tying this game up very late in the game, with the puck sitting on the goaline...
